Nevermind, it was caused by bad named_registration.ca.
David
From: Palmer, David W. [mailto:dwpal...@cazenovia.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 2:09 PM
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Packetfence-users] Switch not changing VLANs
Well the switch is now putting the
Well the switch is now putting the host in the correct vlan and handing out a
dhcp address. My only issue now is that packetfence is not redirecting to the
registration page. Any ideas?
Thanks
David
From: Palmer, David W. [mailto:dwpal...@cazenovia.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 1:12 PM
switches You should look at
this as well ;)
On 11-05-25 10:25 AM, Palmer, David W. wrote:
That could be it, Packetfence is in the same vlan as our servers not the switch
management vlan. Should I just create a eth0.302 (switch management vlan) or
move packetfence into that vlan?
David
From
also check the default gateway of PF, and make sure it's the right
one.
On 11-05-25 10:13 AM, Palmer, David W. wrote:
The public has unrestricted access to the switch
SNMP Communities
Community Name : public
MIB View : ManagerWrite Access : Unrestricted
However, whe
ence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Packetfence-users] Switch not changing VLANs
Hi,
Those seems to be the SNMP Trap settings, you need to check the SNMP read-write
settings.
On 11-05-25 9:42 AM, Palmer, David W. wrote:
I added it the switch, here is my show snmp-server:
Trap Receivers
L
response from remote host '172.30.2.79' (pf::SNMP::connectWrite)
On 11-05-25 9:33 AM, Palmer, David W. wrote:
Hello All,
So I think that I am getting close to having packetfence work. I am now just
experiencing an issue getting the switch to change the vlan when a host is
plugged into the
Hello All,
So I think that I am getting close to having packetfence work. I am now just
experiencing an issue getting the switch to change the vlan when a host is
plugged into the switch. It looks like the switch is talking to Packetfence on
the isolation network address (10.28.5.0) instead of
=Ethernet
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
IPADDR=172.16.1.5
USERCTL=no
IPV6INIT=no
example of ifcfg-eth0.5
DESCRIPTION=REGISTRATION_INTERFACE
VLAN=yes
DEVICE=eth0.5
BOOTPROTO=static
ONBOOT=yes
TYPE=Ethernet
IPADDR=172.16.5.5
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
Regards,
M-A
Le 11-03-30 11:10, Palmer, David W. a écrit
: disable iptables for
testing, re-enable it when you'll be ready for your final tests...
Regards,
M-A
Le 11-03-15 10:19, Palmer, David W. a écrit :
>
> Hello All,
>
> I am currently working on testing packetfence vs several commercial
> NAC solutions. However, I am having an
I don't know but it did work without the quotes.
David
- Original Message -
From: Olivier Bilodeau
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Fri Mar 25 14:14:00 2011
Subject: Re: [Packetfence-users] Packetfence-complete issues
>>
>> [root@pf yum.repos.d]# yum groupinstall
>>
I am getting the following when trying to install packetfence-complete
[root@pf yum.repos.d]# yum groupinstall --enablerepo=PacketFence,rpmforge
"Packetfence-complete"
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* addons: mirror.batblue.com
* base: centos-distro.cavec
Hello All,
I am currently working on testing packetfence vs several commercial NAC
solutions. However, I am having an issue getting DHCPD to start. I receive this
error:
No subnet declaration for eth0 (172.28.4.74).
** Ignoring r
12 matches
Mail list logo
