Am Freitag, 24. Februar 2017, 19:15:27 CET schrieb Stefan Seyfried:
> Am 24.02.2017 um 11:15 schrieb Richard Brown:
> > openSUSE would be happy to take everything we can to help reduce that
> > burden upon Packman
>
> Easy: just build the stuff you think packman should build for you on
> your own.
Am 24.02.2017 um 11:15 schrieb Richard Brown:
> openSUSE would be happy to take everything we can to help reduce that
> burden upon Packman
Easy: just build the stuff you think packman should build for you on
your own.
Then packman people can do what they want. Interesting software.
Multimedia. W
Hi all,
Am 24.02.2017 um 10:29 schrieb Stefan Botter:
> Hi Tomáš, (and of course all other list subscribers),
>
> thank you for your reply.
>
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 22:03:28 +0100
> Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
>> I completely agree that the conflicts should be discussed here. The
>> only
>> person
Am Fri, 24 Feb 2017 17:15:35 +0100
schrieb Bjørn Lie :
> That is quite correct, and if possible: Could we get a "publish"
> filter in place for all packages that "comes out" of
> gstreamer-plugins-bad and gstreamer-plugins-ugly?
That would be both bad and ugly.
-1 from me.
> The only 2 binaries
fr., 24.02.2017 kl. 16.20 +0100, skrev Olaf Hering:
>
> There is probably no need to replace the entire gstreamer stack
> anymore. This is still done in 42.1 for historical reasons,
> everything
> else rebuilds just the bad/ugly plugins from the base distro.
>
>
>
> Olaf
>
That is quite corre
Am Thu, 23 Feb 2017 21:23:42 +0100
schrieb Stefan Botter :
> So here is my wish to start a discussion about the way packages in
> PMBS will be maintained and moderated, and find a consensus. This
> includes also the question, if PMBS's packages should be reduced to
> the subset of full-featured pa
On Friday, 24 February 2017 Olaf Hering wrote:
> >What would be a proper replacement for full mplayer/mencoder
> >functionality?
>
> I do not know the answer to that.
> Not sure what the benefit of MPlayer is today.
Not many I think. The npapi plugin that interfaced it with firefox has been
delet
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017, 14:48:14 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> Am Fri, 24 Feb 2017 11:45:42 +0100
> schrieb Manfred Hollstein :
>
> > What would be a proper replacement for full mplayer/mencoder
> > functionality?
>
> I do not know the answer to that.
> Not sure what the benefit of MPlayer is today.
Am Fri, 24 Feb 2017 11:45:42 +0100
schrieb Manfred Hollstein :
> What would be a proper replacement for full mplayer/mencoder
> functionality?
I do not know the answer to that.
Not sure what the benefit of MPlayer is today.
Olaf
pgpsPFA1QohPG.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017, 12:35:04 +0100, Sagi Ben-Akiva wrote:
> kodi-17.0 and it's binary addons were published in packman repo.
Thanks a lot, will try it as soon as they appear on the mirrors!
> Sagi.
Cheers.
l8er
manfred
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 2017-02-24 12:09, Martin Pluskal wrote:
> My overall goal with packman, at least for Essential project would be
> to have only things that are not suitable for openSUSE there,
> everything else should be in main distributions (Tumbleweed and via
> maintenace updates in Leap) - and achieving this
kodi-17.0 and it's binary addons were published in packman repo.
Sagi.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Martin Pluskal wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 14:49 +0100, Manfred Hollstein wrote:
> > thanks for you explanation! I just added a commen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Fri, 2017-02-24 at 11:49 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> 2017-02-24 10:29 GMT+01:00 Stefan Botter :
>
> > Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> > > I completely agree that the conflicts should be discussed here.
> > > The
> > > only
> > > person I had to revok
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Fri, 2017-02-24 at 11:09 +0100, Manfred Hollstein wrote:
> Indeed! Another example why the current approach to rely on some
> packages being provided by Factory first is kodi-17. It got build by
> some fellow packager here in PMBS with an libcec v
2017-02-24 10:29 GMT+01:00 Stefan Botter :
> Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> > I completely agree that the conflicts should be discussed here. The
> > only
> > person I had to revoke rights I emailed right away explaining the
> > situation because he was blindly reverting all the changes we did
> > with
Moin,
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017, 11:36:11 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> Am Fri, 24 Feb 2017 11:09:42 +0100
> schrieb Manfred Hollstein :
>
> > Indeed! Another example why the current approach to rely on some
> > packages being provided by Factory first is kodi-17.
>
> This is more an issue with the work
Am Fri, 24 Feb 2017 11:09:42 +0100
schrieb Manfred Hollstein :
> Indeed! Another example why the current approach to rely on some
> packages being provided by Factory first is kodi-17.
This is more an issue with the workflow.
Using 'osc bco Multimedia kodi' would have shown the issue right away.
On 24 February 2017 at 10:29, Stefan Botter wrote:
> And here again is the misunderstanding. Packman is not just there to
> provide the same packages as openSUSE, only fully working ones. Packman
> is a repository to host interesting software, which is elsewhere not
> found. Or crippled. Or old.
Hi there,
first of all I'd like to heartfully thank you, Stefan, to start this
discussion. It happened too often during the past months (actually since
TW arrived), that software cannot be installed due to the reasons you
explained very clearly.
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017, 10:29:16 +0100, Stefan Botter
Hi Tomáš, (and of course all other list subscribers),
thank you for your reply.
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 22:03:28 +0100
Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> I completely agree that the conflicts should be discussed here. The
> only
> person I had to revoke rights I emailed right away explaining the
> situation
20 matches
Mail list logo
