-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, 2017-06-05 at 16:49 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
Anyone know if there's good reason it isn't there? Is there something better for
commercials removal that is there? I've yet to figure out the UIs and/or prevent
crashing or hangs using anyt
Am 23.05.2017 um 08:54 schrieb Felix Miata:
> For me at least, 42.2 and 42.3 are broken by a seriously annoying upstream
> wontfix GTK bug, which keeping old GTK3 libs in place avoids.
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757142
why not opening a bug on opensuse to add a 'revert' patch to
Why are there two avidemux packages?
avidemux 2.5.6
avidemux3 2.6.20
Olaf
pgpnzvdHr1Qw8.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
The reason to keep both version was the following post:
https://www.mail-archive.com/packman@links2linux.de/msg07424.html
I don't know if version 2.5.6 can be deleted now.
Am 21. Juni 2017 19:52:53 MESZ schrieb Olaf Hering :
>Why are there two avidemux packages?
>
>avidemux 2.5.6
>avidemux3 2.6.
On 2017-06-21 20:13, Jörg Lorenzen wrote:
> The reason to keep both version was the following post:
>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/packman@links2linux.de/msg07424.html
>
> I don't know if version 2.5.6 can be deleted now.
IMHO they still behave like different programs, not just different versi
Christian composed on 2017-06-21 16:22 (UTC+0200):
.
> Felix Miata composed:
.
>> For me at least, 42.2 and 42.3 are broken by a seriously annoying upstream
>> wontfix GTK bug, which keeping old GTK3 libs in place avoids.
>> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757142
.
> why not opening a bu
