Re: [packman] An advice regarding Kodi packages

Hi, Sorry I totally forgot that I've updated libhdhomerun in my home project. I've submitted a request. Thanks, Sagi. On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Stefan Botter wrote: > On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 09:39:00 +0100 > Guillaume Gardet wrote: > > It

Re: [packman] An advice regarding Kodi packages

On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 09:39:00 +0100 Guillaume Gardet wrote: > It is failing on: > error: 'hdhomerun_discover_find_devices_custom_v2' was not > declared in this scope Because it must use a newer libhdhomerun. See: >

Re: [packman] An advice regarding Kodi packages

Hi, Le 10/03/2016 08:23, Stefan Botter a écrit : Hi, On Wed, 9 Mar 2016 20:50:59 +0200 Sagi Ben-Akiva wrote: Hi, Thank you Stefan and Guillaume for your modifications and accepting the change. I see that kodi.binary-addons build are failing because the following patches

Re: [packman] An advice regarding Kodi packages

Hi, On Wed, 9 Mar 2016 20:50:59 +0200 Sagi Ben-Akiva wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you Stefan and Guillaume for your modifications and accepting > the change. > > I see that kodi.binary-addons build are failing because the following > patches are missing : >

Re: [packman] An advice regarding Kodi packages

Hi, Thank you Stefan and Guillaume for your modifications and accepting the change. I see that kodi.binary-addons build are failing because the following patches are missing : kodi.binary-addons-audiodecoder.ncsf-gcc5.3.patch kodi.binary-addons-screensavers.rsxs-upstream-stdbool_h.patch line

Re: [packman] An advice regarding Kodi packages

Hi, On Wed, 9 Mar 2016 10:29:56 +0100 Stefan Botter wrote: > Once Sagi's submitted packages build fine for Tumbleweed, I will > accept both kodi packages - should be within the hour. Took longer than expected, I had to make some rather crude patches to get some addons to

Re: [packman] An advice regarding Kodi packages

Hi, Le 09/03/2016 10:29, Stefan Botter a écrit : Hi, On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 13:52:25 +0100 Stefan Botter wrote: On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 12:44:25 +0100 Olaf Hering wrote: On Tue, Mar 08, Sagi Ben-Akiva wrote: I've submitted a pull request for kodi 16.0 and

Re: [packman] An advice regarding Kodi packages

Hi, On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 13:52:25 +0100 Stefan Botter wrote: > On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 12:44:25 +0100 > Olaf Hering wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 08, Sagi Ben-Akiva wrote: > > > > > I've submitted a pull request for kodi 16.0 and binary addons > > > packages. Can

Re: [packman] An advice regarding Kodi packages

On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 12:44:25 +0100 Olaf Hering wrote: > On Tue, Mar 08, Sagi Ben-Akiva wrote: > > > I've submitted a pull request for kodi 16.0 and binary addons > > packages. Can someone review the request ? > > What happend to libSOIL? Its missing in Factory, so the addon

Re: [packman] An advice regarding Kodi packages

> > if the individual binary packages for kodi are on github in separate > repos, we can set up these packages using source services, almost > generic, like done with vdr (in OBS). > > Yes they are, each binary addon is maintained in a separate github repo, for example : adsp.freesurround

Re: [packman] An advice regarding Kodi packages

Hi, On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 13:53:11 +0100 Hendrik Vogelsang wrote: > That's just another layer of indirection isn't it? Whatever Sagi > deems neccesarry should be required by the main package. The rest can > be handled by weak dependencies (Recommends). I am not sure if we

Re: [packman] An advice regarding Kodi packages

Hey, On 23.02.2016 13:26, Markus Kohm wrote: I would definitively mimic the official packaging. Me too. But maybe pseudo-packages for groups of addons would be usefull, e.g. kodi-addons-video that requires all video addons but does not contain any addon, and a pseudo-package kodi-addons-all

Re: [packman] An advice regarding Kodi packages

> I would definitively mimic the official packaging. Me too. But maybe pseudo-packages for groups of addons would be usefull, e.g. kodi-addons-video that requires all video addons but does not contain any addon, and a pseudo-package kodi-addons-all that requires all addons. This should be

Re: [packman] An advice regarding Kodi packages

Hey, On 22.02.2016 20:53, Sagi Ben-Akiva wrote: On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Stefan Botter wrote: On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:44:06 +0200 Sagi Ben-Akiva wrote: 1. Do you think we should keep them in 2 separate projects or merge them to one ? 2. Should

Re: [packman] An advice regarding Kodi packages

Hi Stefan, On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Stefan Botter wrote: > Hi Sagi, > > On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:44:06 +0200 > Sagi Ben-Akiva wrote: > > Kodi Jarvis 16.0 was released yesterday, and it is already being > > built in my home project. > > > >

Re: [packman] An advice regarding Kodi packages

Hi Sagi, On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:44:06 +0200 Sagi Ben-Akiva wrote: > Kodi Jarvis 16.0 was released yesterday, and it is already being > built in my home project. > > https://pmbs.links2linux.de/package/show/home:sagiben/kodi.binary-addons >

[packman] An advice regarding Kodi packages

Hi, Kodi Jarvis 16.0 was released yesterday, and it is already being built in my home project. https://pmbs.links2linux.de/package/show/home:sagiben/kodi.binary-addons https://pmbs.links2linux.de/package/show/home:sagiben/kodi In latest Kodi, all the binary addons were branched out from Kodi