With the merge of Factory and openSUSE_Tumbleweed we can save some
cycles. Both repositories will be based on identical OBS sources. So for
PMBS we can remove one of them.
This means the publisher needs an update. Maybe it helps current users
of both repos of the one that gets removed is symlink
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2014-11-04 12:07, Olaf Hering wrote:
>
> With the merge of Factory and openSUSE_Tumbleweed we can save some
> cycles. Both repositories will be based on identical OBS sources.
> So for PMBS we can remove one of them.
They are not exactly merged.
Tirsdag den 4. november 2014 14:22:07 skrev Carlos E. R.:
> On 2014-11-04 12:07, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > With the merge of Factory and openSUSE_Tumbleweed we can save some
> > cycles. Both repositories will be based on identical OBS sources.
> > So for PMBS we can remove one of them.
>
> They are n
On Tue, Nov 04, Martin Schlander wrote:
> Maybe the Tumbleweed repo can just be deleted, and the Factory one renamed to
> Tumbleweed, more or less.
coolo put it nicely: "There are no Factory users, there are only
Factory developers. And they develop Tumbleweed, which is developed in
Factory for
2014-11-04 16:26 GMT+01:00 Olaf Hering :
> On Tue, Nov 04, Martin Schlander wrote:
>
> > Maybe the Tumbleweed repo can just be deleted, and the Factory one
> renamed to
> > Tumbleweed, more or less.
>
> coolo put it nicely: "There are no Factory users, there are only
> Factory developers. And they
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2014-11-04 14:29, Martin Schlander wrote:
> Tirsdag den 4. november 2014 14:22:07 skrev Carlos E. R.:
>> On 2014-11-04 12:07, Olaf Hering wrote:
> Packman should only need to build for Tumbleweed starting today.
>
> Of course the Tumbleweed of To
