----- Dave Plater <davejpla...@gmail.com> a écrit : > On 12/2/20, Olaf Hering <o...@aepfle.de> wrote: > > Am Tue, 1 Dec 2020 10:56:20 +0100 (CET) > > schrieb Guillaume GARDET <guillaume.gar...@free.fr>: > > > >> Any objections? > > > > The publisher may need adjustments, perhaps it has a fixed list of > > architectures. > > > > It also means all 'openSUSE_Factory_ARM' *.repo files out there become > > invalid. The published directory may stay on the mirrors, unless someone > > removes it manually and the mirrors pickup this change. > > > > A number of pkg's may need adjustment in case they have special handling for > > a 'openSUSE_Factory_ARM' repository, but not for 'openSUSE_Tumbleweed' or > > 'arch='. Each one should probably be reevaluated if such knob is still > > justified. > > > > Olaf > > > I also had this problem with Factory on a raspberry pi but it seems > that there isn't a problem anymore. I chose Tumbleweed because it had > more built packages and used the same repository definition that I use > for my x86_64 computer. I was able to install the ffmpeg-4 libs which > is all I needed anyway. > The repository definition is: > http://packman.inode.at/suse/openSUSE_Tumbleweed/
I added aarch64 and armv7 to Tumbleweed repo on some projects lately, as a test. Guillaume > > Regards > Dave _______________________________________________ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de https://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman