Re: [packman] Stable Packman for Leap

2016-06-20 Diskussionsfäden Olaf Hering
On Mon, Jun 20, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > Ok guys this is again half-assed solution with package suffixes and others. This is for the current way of publishing packages. > We need to do this properly. I'm actually ok with reorganizing the whole project layout. Since the resulting layout is not

Re: [packman] Stable Packman for Leap

2016-06-20 Diskussionsfäden Tomáš Chvátal
Ok guys this is again half-assed solution with package suffixes and others. We need to do this properly. 1) Have packman-essentials-Factory project * builds against factory only * links only factory packages * links only factory deps 2) Have packman-essentials-Product project * Builds only

Re: [packman] Stable Packman for Leap

2016-06-20 Diskussionsfäden Dave Plater
On 6/20/16, Frederic Crozat wrote: > Le lun. 20 juin 2016 à 10:07, Dave Plater a écrit : > >> This thread has the wrong subject. >> > > Not anymore ;) > > I think this is a proposal for a new Packman model. >> Rolling release Packman and stable Packman,

Re: [packman] Stable Packman for Leap

2016-06-20 Diskussionsfäden Olaf Hering
On Mon, Jun 20, Frederic Crozat wrote: > Le lun. 20 juin 2016 à 10:07, Dave Plater a écrit : > I think this is a proposal for a new Packman model. > > Rolling release Packman and stable Packman, because ATM it is > > impossible to have both but maybe Richard can help to

[packman] Stable Packman for Leap

2016-06-20 Diskussionsfäden Frederic Crozat
Le lun. 20 juin 2016 à 10:07, Dave Plater a écrit : > This thread has the wrong subject. > Not anymore ;) I think this is a proposal for a new Packman model. > Rolling release Packman and stable Packman, because ATM it is > impossible to have both but maybe Richard can