[packman] Workers ...

2017-02-23 Thread Stefan Botter
Hi all, I am aware of the missing workers, unfortunately there is again a problem with my storage hosting the virtual machines, and I am unable to fix it rapidly. There are still the 5 workers, which are real hardware, for the time being. It may take until end of March, until I can replace the st

Re: [packman] Workers ...

2017-02-23 Thread Olaf Hering
Am Thu, 23 Feb 2017 14:36:18 +0100 schrieb Stefan Botter : > There are still the 5 workers, which are real hardware, for the time > being. swkj13 makes appearently no progress. It should be disabled for the time being. Olaf pgpeAKpLrIPO2.pgp Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP _

[packman] Workers for x86/_64 are borked :-)

2023-09-29 Thread Bjørn Lie
Heads-up people - seems the build workers are on strike. When checking a scheduled build -> the following msg appears: waiting for 8 compliant workers (1 of them down) (7 of them bad) And when a package does try to build - this is a snippet from the logs: [ 0s] booting kvm... [ 0s] ### VM INT

Re: [packman] Workers for x86/_64 are borked :-)

2023-09-29 Thread Stefan Seyfried
Hi Bjørn, On 29.09.23 17:23, Bjørn Lie wrote: Heads-up people - seems the build workers are on strike. When checking a scheduled build -> the following msg appears: waiting for 8 compliant workers (1 of them down) (7 of them bad) And when a package does try to build - this is a snippet from

Re: [packman] Workers for x86/_64 are borked :-)

2023-10-09 Thread Stefan Botter
Hi Stefan, picking up on that: Am Freitag, dem 29.09.2023 um 20:48 +0200 schrieb Stefan Seyfried: > Hi Bjørn, > > On 29.09.23 17:23, Bjørn Lie wrote: > > Heads-up people - seems the build workers are on strike. : > > This goes on and on until > > > > [ 193s] Generating "/run/initramfs/rdsosrepo

Re: [packman] Workers for x86/_64 are borked :-)

2023-10-09 Thread Stefan Seyfried
Hi Stefan, On 09.10.23 13:01, Stefan Botter wrote: I see, that some - if not all - builds for Slowroll fail on my workers (buildwk1 and 3) like in the above described scenario. Do you have an idea? Is there a kernel-obs-build in slowroll? If yes, is it used? Maybe something missing from the pr

Re: [packman] Workers for x86/_64 are borked :-)

2023-10-09 Thread Stefan Seyfried
On 09.10.23 15:17, Stefan Seyfried wrote: Hi Stefan, On 09.10.23 13:01, Stefan Botter wrote: I see, that some - if not all - builds for Slowroll fail on my workers (buildwk1 and 3) like in the above described scenario. Do you have an idea? Is there a kernel-obs-build in slowroll? If yes, is i