On Mon, Aug 15, Olaf Hering wrote:
> Does anyone still care about SLE_11 in packman? I think its time to
> retire it to free resources. The binary packages will remain on the
> mirrors.
>
> Before it gets wiped from PMBS we should make sure the packages will
> work and the dependencies are
On 16 August 2016 at 15:07, Bruno Friedmann wrote:
> On mardi, 16 août 2016 10.51:53 h CEST Luigi Baldoni wrote:
>> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 at 9:38 PM
>> From: "Olaf Hering"
>>
>> > Does anyone still care about SLE_11 in packman? I think its time to
>> >
On mardi, 16 août 2016 10.51:53 h CEST Luigi Baldoni wrote:
> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 at 9:38 PM
> From: "Olaf Hering"
>
> > Does anyone still care about SLE_11 in packman? I think its time to
> > retire it to free resources. The binary packages will remain on the
> >
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 at 9:38 PM
From: "Olaf Hering"
> Does anyone still care about SLE_11 in packman? I think its time to
> retire it to free resources. The binary packages will remain on the
> mirrors.
I seriously doubt anyone using SLE11 at this point is interested in
Does anyone still care about SLE_11 in packman? I think its time to
retire it to free resources. The binary packages will remain on the
mirrors.
Before it gets wiped from PMBS we should make sure the packages will
work and the dependencies are fulfilled.
Olaf
signature.asc
Description: PGP