Re: [packman] dropping support for SLE_11

2016-11-04 Diskussionsfäden Olaf Hering
On Mon, Aug 15, Olaf Hering wrote: > Does anyone still care about SLE_11 in packman? I think its time to > retire it to free resources. The binary packages will remain on the > mirrors. > > Before it gets wiped from PMBS we should make sure the packages will > work and the dependencies are

Re: [packman] dropping support for SLE_11

2016-08-16 Diskussionsfäden Richard Brown
On 16 August 2016 at 15:07, Bruno Friedmann wrote: > On mardi, 16 août 2016 10.51:53 h CEST Luigi Baldoni wrote: >> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 at 9:38 PM >> From: "Olaf Hering" >> >> > Does anyone still care about SLE_11 in packman? I think its time to >> >

Re: [packman] dropping support for SLE_11

2016-08-16 Diskussionsfäden Bruno Friedmann
On mardi, 16 août 2016 10.51:53 h CEST Luigi Baldoni wrote: > Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 at 9:38 PM > From: "Olaf Hering" > > > Does anyone still care about SLE_11 in packman? I think its time to > > retire it to free resources. The binary packages will remain on the > >

Re: [packman] dropping support for SLE_11

2016-08-16 Diskussionsfäden Luigi Baldoni
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 at 9:38 PM From: "Olaf Hering" > Does anyone still care about SLE_11 in packman? I think its time to > retire it to free resources. The binary packages will remain on the > mirrors. I seriously doubt anyone using SLE11 at this point is interested in

[packman] dropping support for SLE_11

2016-08-15 Diskussionsfäden Olaf Hering
Does anyone still care about SLE_11 in packman? I think its time to retire it to free resources. The binary packages will remain on the mirrors. Before it gets wiped from PMBS we should make sure the packages will work and the dependencies are fulfilled. Olaf signature.asc Description: PGP