Re: [packman] libx264-152 very slow

Moin, On Mon, 26 Mar 2018, 08:45:09 +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: > Am Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:07:55 +0100 > schrieb Manfred Hollstein : > > > Is there a chance we can revert the change? > > Does the post-20170816 version bring a true benefit, other than a new SONAME? Not that I

Re: [packman] libx264-152 very slow

Am Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:07:55 +0100 schrieb Manfred Hollstein : > Is there a chance we can revert the change? Does the post-20170816 version bring a true benefit, other than a new SONAME? I would rather revert to rev19 for the lifetime of Leap42 because that version works for

Re: [packman] libx264-152 very slow

I've linked nasm to openSUSE:Factory (build enabled for Leap 42.3 and SLE-12) and submitted an SR for libx264. Currently there are a lot of active (re)builds, so it will take a little time until all packages are published. ___ Packman mailing list

Re: [packman] libx264-152 very slow

On Fri, 23 Mar 2018, 10:35:13 +0100, Manfred Hollstein wrote: > [...] > The good news is, devel:tools:compiler:nasm in version 2.13.03 builds > without any trouble on Leap 42.3 and can then be used to build libx264 > with the "--disable-asm" removed again. I just branched "nasm" and > "yasm" from

Re: [packman] libx264-152 very slow

Moin, On Fri, 23 Mar 2018, 09:09:07 +0100, Luigi Baldoni wrote: > Sent: Friday, March 23, 2018 at 8:08 AM > From: Grozdan > > > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 9:58 PM, Jörg Lorenzen > > wrote: > > > Same for me, the average of encoded frames has

Re: [packman] libx264-152 very slow

Sent: Friday, March 23, 2018 at 8:08 AM From: Grozdan > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 9:58 PM, Jörg Lorenzen > wrote: > > Same for me, the average of encoded frames has decreased from 25 fps down > > to 7 fps (source: h264 interlaced, target: h264

Re: [packman] libx264-152 very slow

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 9:58 PM, Jörg Lorenzen wrote: > Same for me, the average of encoded frames has decreased from 25 fps down to > 7 fps (source: h264 interlaced, target: h264 deinterlaced). > I think we should go back to the previous revision. it sounds to me that

Re: [packman] libx264-152 very slow

Same for me, the average of encoded frames has decreased from 25 fps down to 7 fps (source: h264 interlaced, target: h264 deinterlaced). I think we should go back to the previous revision. ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de

[packman] libx264-152 very slow

Hi there, I normally convert my .ts videos using h264 format in handbrake. Normally its encoding rate is around 90-100 fps, but I currently only get around 16 fps using libx264-152 on openSUSE_Leap_42.3. This means that encoding a video takes longer than the video itself lasts... I compared this