On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 04:46:51PM +0100, Cristian Morales Vega wrote:
> On 25 July 2012 16:27, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 03:56:12PM +0100, Cristian Morales Vega wrote:
> >> On 25 July 2012 15:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 02:54:19PM +010
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 03:56:12PM +0100, Cristian Morales Vega wrote:
> On 25 July 2012 15:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 02:54:19PM +0100, Cristian Morales Vega wrote:
> >> On 2 June 2012 14:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 07:27:06PM +0100
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 02:54:19PM +0100, Cristian Morales Vega wrote:
> On 2 June 2012 14:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 07:27:06PM +0100, Cristian Morales Vega wrote:
> >> On 18 April 2012 01:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >> > Ok, but where did the version of redlan
On 25 July 2012 16:27, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 03:56:12PM +0100, Cristian Morales Vega wrote:
>> On 25 July 2012 15:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 02:54:19PM +0100, Cristian Morales Vega wrote:
>> >> On 2 June 2012 14:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman
On 25 July 2012 15:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 02:54:19PM +0100, Cristian Morales Vega wrote:
>> On 2 June 2012 14:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 07:27:06PM +0100, Cristian Morales Vega wrote:
>> >> On 18 April 2012 01:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman
On 2 June 2012 14:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 07:27:06PM +0100, Cristian Morales Vega wrote:
>> On 18 April 2012 01:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> > Ok, but where did the version of redland-bindings come from? Shouldn't
>> > I just link in the X11:common:Factory ver
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 07:27:06PM +0100, Cristian Morales Vega wrote:
> On 18 April 2012 01:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > Ok, but where did the version of redland-bindings come from? Shouldn't
> > I just link in the X11:common:Factory versions of redland AND
> > redland-bindings into Tumblew
On 18 April 2012 01:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> Ok, but where did the version of redland-bindings come from? Shouldn't
> I just link in the X11:common:Factory versions of redland AND
> redland-bindings into Tumbleweed, instead of using the version of
> redland from KDE-4.8?
Sure.
__
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 05:41:25PM +0200, Pascal Bleser wrote:
> On 2012-04-17 14:04:09 (+0100), Cristian Morales Vega
> wrote:
> > On 17 April 2012 13:48, Pascal Bleser wrote:
> > >> And what the purpose of redland-bindings-1.0.14 for Tumbleweed??
>
> > > Fixes the broken python-redland that i
On 2012-04-17 14:04:09 (+0100), Cristian Morales Vega
wrote:
> On 17 April 2012 13:48, Pascal Bleser wrote:
> >> And what the purpose of redland-bindings-1.0.14 for Tumbleweed??
> > Fixes the broken python-redland that is currently in Tumbleweed,
> > and which prevented the build of some packag
On 17 April 2012 13:48, Pascal Bleser wrote:
>> And what the purpose of redland-bindings-1.0.14 for Tumbleweed??
>
> Fixes the broken python-redland that is currently in Tumbleweed,
> and which prevented the build of some packages (most notably
> OpenOctaveMidi) because it was pulled in as some tr
On 2012-04-17 12:23:36 (+0100), Cristian Morales Vega
wrote:
> Are not live and live555 the same package? Why we have it twice?
Yeah, I packaged live555 by taking it over from dimstar's vlc
repo for vlc 2.0 and didn't notice that we had it already as
"live".
I'm switching things over to live555-
Are not live and live555 the same package? Why we have it twice?
And what the purpose of redland-bindings-1.0.14 for Tumbleweed??
___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
13 matches
Mail list logo
