Re: [packman] mplayer2 state/removal

On Saturday 19 December 2015 12:30:43 David Haller wrote: > I always thought it a bit presumptous, that the fork called itself > mplayer2. As a player, it definitely was a step forward, and I seriously hope no one is using MEncoder anymore, given all its flaws and ugly hacks. MEncoder was

Re: [packman] mplayer2 state/removal

Hello, On Fri, 18 Dec 2015, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: >How would you feel if we removed mplayer2 from packman. It ceased >developement in 2013 so it is much safer bet if you move to mpv or back to >mplayer. Sticking to mplayer2 is not the best bet for the future... :) As mplayer2 doesn't even contain

Re: [packman] mplayer2 state/removal

On Saturday 19 December 2015 11:18:54 Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > Okey, I will remove it then. > > Just to play nice either mpv or mplayer should provide the mplayer2 to > allow user to migrate, otherwise they might get quite suprised their media > player disappeared. Any strong prefference? While

Re: [packman] mplayer2 state/removal

Okey, I will remove it then. Just to play nice either mpv or mplayer should provide the mplayer2 to allow user to migrate, otherwise they might get quite suprised their media player disappeared. Any strong prefference? Tom 2015-12-19 11:14 GMT+01:00 Martin Herkt : > I’m

Re: [packman] mplayer2 state/removal

Tomáš Chvátal composed on 2015-12-18 17:29 (UTC+0100): > How would you feel if we removed mplayer2 from packman. It ceased > developement in 2013 so it is much safer bet if you move to mpv or back to > mplayer. Sticking to mplayer2 is not the best bet for the future... :) Long time since I was

[packman] mplayer2 state/removal

Hello everyone, How would you feel if we removed mplayer2 from packman. It ceased developement in 2013 so it is much safer bet if you move to mpv or back to mplayer. Sticking to mplayer2 is not the best bet for the future... :) Cheers Tom ___ Packman

Re: [packman] mplayer2 state/removal

I’m the guy who forked SMPlayer2 in the first place. It’s just as dead as mplayer2. There’s no reason to keep it around anymore. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de