On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, 23:16:55 +0100, Pascal Bleser wrote:
> On 2010-11-24 15:03:32 (+0100), Manfred Hollstein wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, 01:09:40 +0100, rlee wrote:
> > > There was a long discussion on the legality of libfaac it turned out that
> > > Packman could not keep its version of lib
On 2010-11-24 15:03:32 (+0100), Manfred Hollstein wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, 01:09:40 +0100, rlee wrote:
> > There was a long discussion on the legality of libfaac it turned out that
> > Packman could not keep its version of libfaac so it was switched off. The
> > discussion was about ffmpeg.
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, 01:09:40 +0100, rlee wrote:
> There was a long discussion on the legality of libfaac it turned out that
> Packman could not keep its version of libfaac so it was switched off. The
> discussion was about ffmpeg. You'll find it under that subject in the
> archives, the date for
There was a long discussion on the legality of libfaac it turned out that
Packman could not keep its version of libfaac so it was switched off. The
discussion was about ffmpeg. You'll find it under that subject in the
archives, the date for the thread was around Nov 16.
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11
Hi there,
it appears to me that the $SUBJECT repo is inconsistent. When I run the
following command on my system
zypper se -s $(rpm -qa | sed -e 's,-[^-]*-[^-]*$,,') | fgrep 'System Packages'
it shows that libfaac0 from Packman is no longer available from the
repo. Running
zypper se -s libf
