> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Nagy Gabor
> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Since the patch is quite long and it depends on my working branch, I
> > don't send it here directly. It can be found in my repo (it is a new
> > branch): http://repo.or.cz/w/pacman-ng.git
> >
> > ---quote---
> > Remove pmsyncpk
> > -- new suggestions :) [optional] --
> >
> > 3. Now it can happen, that a missing dependency is added to the
> > *data list many times. For example, if there is a popular
> > unresolvable package in our repo, let's say gtk2, and we have 10
> > packages in the target list depend on that, then we
Nagy Gabor wrote:
Bump on these. As I see, 1-2 are fixed now (mentioned in the first
mail of this thread). But the "duplicated messages/data-list" issue is
still here. After my "Print warning in _alpm_resolvedep() if a satisfier
package is ignored without QUESTION" patch this issue became even w
On Sunday 12 April 2009 05:21:28 Allan McRae wrote:
> Dan McGee wrote:
> > If you want to get a patch on your working branch for this before we
> > release 3.3.0, which I want to do soon, that would be cool
>
> I thought I should post what I see as my TODOs before a pacman-3.3
> release so people c
> Nagy Gabor wrote:
> >
> > Bump on these. As I see, 1-2 are fixed now (mentioned in the first
> > mail of this thread). But the "duplicated messages/data-list" issue
> > is still here. After my "Print warning in _alpm_resolvedep() if a
> > satisfier package is ignored without QUESTION" patch this
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 01:08:15PM -0500, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Loui Chang wrote:
> > The index in the for loop wasn't being incremented, so
> > if the first file wasn't found, the second file would be compared to the
> > first checksum, rather than the second.
> >
>
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Loui Chang wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 01:08:15PM -0500, Dan McGee wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Loui Chang wrote:
>> > The index in the for loop wasn't being incremented, so
>> > if the first file wasn't found, the second file would be compared
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 11:04:55PM -0500, Dan McGee wrote:
> Yeah, Xavier and I figured it out over IM the other day. You'll see
> this commit which resolves the issue that has been outstanding for
> quite some time.
>
> http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=pacman.git;a=commitdiff;h=101c16b3eb8048dffd
