On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Nagy Gaborng...@bibl.u-szeged.hu wrote:
From cfcaa50b83d6ce09a026e8275f19ce0665365e31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
2001
From: Nagy Gabor ng...@bibl.u-szeged.hu
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 17:04:29 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] New sync070.py pactest
This pactest tests the
This pactest currently fails. It shows that the current sync
addtarget is quite messy. Most of the work (search for provision,
install group) is done in the front-end, some of the work done in the
back-end (interpret '/', avoid duplicated targets, and the
conversion from pmpkg_t to
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Nagy Gaborng...@bibl.u-szeged.hu wrote:
This pactest currently fails. It shows that the current sync
addtarget is quite messy. Most of the work (search for provision,
install group) is done in the front-end, some of the work done in the
back-end (interpret
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Nagy Gaborng...@bibl.u-szeged.hu wrote:
This pactest currently fails. It shows that the current sync
addtarget is quite messy. Most of the work (search for provision,
install group) is done in the front-end, some of the work done in the
back-end
