Hi guys,
here's an update Italian translation for pacman and libalpm.
Thanks.
--
Arch Linux Developer
http://www.archlinux.org
http://www.archlinux.it
pacman-it.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
___
pacman-dev mailing list
pacman-dev@archl
0001-Fix-2-minor-memleaks.patch
Description: Binary data
___
pacman-dev mailing list
pacman-dev@archlinux.org
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Xavier Chantry wrote:
> When one package wants to replace a directory by a file, we check that all
> files in that directory were owned by that package.
>
> Additionally pacman can be more verbose when the extraction of the symlink
> (or file) fails. The patch to ad
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Steven Blatchford wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> I'm sure this has been brought up in the pacman ML but I couldn't find
> it quickly. Do you think it would be useful to check the architecture
> of the machine (eg the output of 'uname -m') against the binary pacman
> is downl
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "The official pacman repository".
The branch, master has been updated
via 344ced22c347b347b55818bb93579ffa2eb9c70b (commit)
vi
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Steven Blatchford
> wrote:
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> I'm sure this has been brought up in the pacman ML but I couldn't find
>> it quickly. Do you think it would be useful to check the architecture
>> of the machine (eg th
Just checking the sanity of an idea here:
What do you all think of supporting wildcards for version comparisons?
I was thinking fnmatch could almost be dropped in directly to
alpm_pkg_vercmp in place of the initial strcmp.
Use case:
readline version 6.0.003
bash depends readline=6.0.*
Thoughts?
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Steven Blatchford
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Dan,
>>>
>>> I'm sure this has been brought up in the pacman ML but I couldn't find
>>> it quickly. Do you think it woul
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Steven Blatchford
>>> wrote:
Hi Dan,
I'm sure this has been brought up in the pacman ML
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> Just checking the sanity of an idea here:
>
> What do you all think of supporting wildcards for version comparisons?
> I was thinking fnmatch could almost be dropped in directly to
> alpm_pkg_vercmp in place of the initial strcmp.
>
> Use case
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Aaron Griffin
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Steven Blatchford
wrote:
> Hi
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
> 3. If your name is Allan McRae (or anyone else) and you run an x86_64
> kernel in an i686 userspace
Oh, that guy? He owes me twenty bucks
Honestly though, I get your point - nocheck makes sense. But it does
sound like it should be the edge case,
Dan McGee wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Steven Blat
13 matches
Mail list logo
