Re: [pacman-dev] makepkg -i should fail when packages cannot be installed

2009-09-02 Thread Allan McRae
Aaron Griffin wrote: On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote: Am Donnerstag 03 September 2009 00:02:03 schrieb Dan McGee: Why use -i at all then? Since you want to check the install, shouldn't that be a seperate step in your script? E.g. Run makepkg, check for a 0 return, t

Re: [pacman-dev] makepkg -i should fail when packages cannot be installed

2009-09-02 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > Am Donnerstag 03 September 2009 00:02:03 schrieb Dan McGee: >> Why use -i at all then? Since you want to check the install, shouldn't >> that be a seperate step in your script? E.g. Run makepkg, check for a >> 0 return, then run pacman and che

Re: [pacman-dev] makepkg -i should fail when packages cannot be installed

2009-09-02 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am Donnerstag 03 September 2009 00:02:03 schrieb Dan McGee: > Why use -i at all then? Since you want to check the install, shouldn't > that be a seperate step in your script? E.g. Run makepkg, check for a > 0 return, then run pacman and check for a 0 return. Sure, that simple to implement, that's

Re: [pacman-dev] makepkg -i should fail when packages cannot be installed

2009-09-02 Thread Dan McGee
On Wednesday, September 2, 2009, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > Am Mittwoch 02 September 2009 01:05:04 schrieb Allan McRae: >> Pierre Schmitz wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I would file a bug report but somehow... >> > >> > It seems makepkg -i just throws a warning if it cannot install the >> > package after

Re: [pacman-dev] makepkg -i should fail when packages cannot be installed

2009-09-02 Thread Pierre Schmitz
Am Mittwoch 02 September 2009 01:05:04 schrieb Allan McRae: > Pierre Schmitz wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would file a bug report but somehow... > > > > It seems makepkg -i just throws a warning if it cannot install the > > package after build. I would prefer if it would at least return something > > d

Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH] '-Spp and -Supp' options were added to generate uri list without the downloaded package uris

2009-09-02 Thread Laszlo Papp
> > Instead of adding several options, wouldn't it be possible to let "-p" > > accept a string argument with formatting information similar to the way > > the date command works. This would be extensible in the future and > > could include the following interpretted sequences (among others) > > > >

[pacman-dev] My repo has moved

2009-09-02 Thread Allan McRae
With the reinstall of the Arch server, my pacman working git repo has now moved to git://projects.archlinux.org/users/allan/pacman.git Allan

Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH] '-Spp and -Supp' options were added to generate uri list without the downloaded package uris

2009-09-02 Thread Xavier
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 5:16 AM, Xyne wrote: >> --print-pkg and --print-uris looks good to me >> >> but would you keep your new feature on top of these two options : >> --print-pkg and --print-uris only show non-download packages >> --print-pkg --print-pkg and --print-uris --print-uris show all >> ?