Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Am Donnerstag 03 September 2009 00:02:03 schrieb Dan McGee:
Why use -i at all then? Since you want to check the install, shouldn't
that be a seperate step in your script? E.g. Run makepkg, check for a
0 return, t
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Am Donnerstag 03 September 2009 00:02:03 schrieb Dan McGee:
>> Why use -i at all then? Since you want to check the install, shouldn't
>> that be a seperate step in your script? E.g. Run makepkg, check for a
>> 0 return, then run pacman and che
Am Donnerstag 03 September 2009 00:02:03 schrieb Dan McGee:
> Why use -i at all then? Since you want to check the install, shouldn't
> that be a seperate step in your script? E.g. Run makepkg, check for a
> 0 return, then run pacman and check for a 0 return.
Sure, that simple to implement, that's
On Wednesday, September 2, 2009, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 02 September 2009 01:05:04 schrieb Allan McRae:
>> Pierre Schmitz wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I would file a bug report but somehow...
>> >
>> > It seems makepkg -i just throws a warning if it cannot install the
>> > package after
Am Mittwoch 02 September 2009 01:05:04 schrieb Allan McRae:
> Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would file a bug report but somehow...
> >
> > It seems makepkg -i just throws a warning if it cannot install the
> > package after build. I would prefer if it would at least return something
> > d
> > Instead of adding several options, wouldn't it be possible to let "-p"
> > accept a string argument with formatting information similar to the way
> > the date command works. This would be extensible in the future and
> > could include the following interpretted sequences (among others)
> >
> >
With the reinstall of the Arch server, my pacman working git repo has
now moved to git://projects.archlinux.org/users/allan/pacman.git
Allan
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 5:16 AM, Xyne wrote:
>> --print-pkg and --print-uris looks good to me
>>
>> but would you keep your new feature on top of these two options :
>> --print-pkg and --print-uris only show non-download packages
>> --print-pkg --print-pkg and --print-uris --print-uris show all
>> ?