Hello!
Is translation of manual pages supported in pacman development ? I ask this,
because I don't see any man pages apart from English.
The french translation can be seen here e.g.:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11180
I would deal with the hungarian manpages in the future, if you
Marc - A. Dahlhaus [ Administration | Westermann GmbH ] wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 15.09.2009, 23:14 +1000 schrieb Allan McRae:
repo-remove... but I am assuming you mean some automated tool to remove
useless deltas? Not yet, and I doubt there will be until someone
starts using deltas in a
Dan McGee wrote:
Any blockers or objections to going with what we pretty much have
right now? We'll need a (short) translation period of course as we
updated and added some messages, but I can't think of much else.
All makepkg issues I know about have been address so I am happy for a
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
Any blockers or objections to going with what we pretty much have
right now? We'll need a (short) translation period of course as we
updated and added some messages, but I can't think of much else.
One objection : someone
Hi!
This discussion is motivated by FS#16117.
First of all, I know that pacman -Sy foo is not recommended, only
pacman -Syu foo (see commit f53d9ba), but it is still allowed by
pacman (which is distro independent), so I must mention the following
situation:
---sync405.py---
self.description =
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Nagy Gabor ng...@bibl.u-szeged.hu wrote:
+1 for Xavier's suggestion, see also:
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2009-July/009064.html
Someone should collect the problematic strings and fix them in a commit.
Personally I can recall two of
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Nagy Gabor ng...@bibl.u-szeged.hu wrote:
In this case we should clearly choose dep-ng dependency satisfier,
because it has an older version installed. Unfortunately computing all
satisfiers then choosing is much slower then search for literal (if
provisions
Marc - A. Dahlhaus [ Administration | Westermann GmbH ] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 16.09.2009, 16:18 +1000 schrieb Allan McRae:
Marc - A. Dahlhaus [ Administration | Westermann GmbH ] wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 15.09.2009, 23:14 +1000 schrieb Allan McRae:
repo-remove... but I am
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Marc - A. Dahlhaus [ Administration
| Westermann GmbH ] m...@wol.de wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 16.09.2009, 18:05 +0200 schrieb Marc - A. Dahlhaus
[ Administration | Westermann GmbH ]:
Am Donnerstag, den 17.09.2009, 01:45 +1000 schrieb Allan McRae:
Marc - A.
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Marc - A. Dahlhaus [ Administration |
Westermann GmbH ] m...@wol.de wrote:
Actually first i got confused as repo-remove is documented to take a
pkgname as param to remove the whole package (including deltas) from the
repo. To use the deltapackage-filename as
./src/pacman/package.c:
- small typo fix
./src/pacman/pacman.c:
- strdup is changed to strndup, because it's safer like in
case of config option
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Papp djsza...@gmail.com
---
src/pacman/package.c |2 +-
src/pacman/pacman.c |2 +-
2 files
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Matthias Gorissen matth...@archlinux.dewrote:
Previous discussions of this always ended with something like Oh, we love
what you are doing there - just go on and make it a community project.
Which you should do - who cares about being official? If people like
Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:40:37 -0500
Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Xavier shinin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for pointing that
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:40:37 -0500
Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Xavier shinin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Aaron
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project The official pacman repository.
The branch, maint has been updated
via ed9d459ee2e0f44ad6365b2027db1486363b649e (commit)
from
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Xavier shinin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
Any blockers or objections to going with what we pretty much have
right now? We'll need a (short) translation period of course as we
updated and added some
16 matches
Mail list logo
