On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Xavier shinin...@gmail.com wrote:
PS : the rule on all mailing list I know is to bottom post. this
includes all arch ML. please respect this :)
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 2:12 PM, 甘露(Gan Lu) rhythm@gmail.com wrote:
Could you give a link to download the lastest
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 2:49 PM, 甘露(Gan Lu) rhythm@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, Gmail's bad default setting. Please check out the attachment,
hope not too late.
After 3 days of delay, 3.3.2 was finally released :
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2009-October/013794.html
So
Just as we do in -Qi, we can compute required by information for sync
database packages. The behavior seems sane; for a given package, the -Si
required by will show all packages in *any* sync database that require it.
Implements FS#16244.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee d...@archlinux.org
---
Dan McGee schrieb:
Just as we do in -Qi, we can compute required by information for sync
database packages. The behavior seems sane; for a given package, the -Si
required by will show all packages in *any* sync database that require it.
Implements FS#16244.
I was wondering about -Qi too:
Dan McGee schrieb:
Just as we do in -Qi, we can compute required by information for sync
database packages. The behavior seems sane; for a given package, the -Si
required by will show all packages in *any* sync database that require it.
Implements FS#16244.
I was wondering about
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Nagy Gabor ng...@bibl.u-szeged.hu wrote:
Dan McGee schrieb:
Just as we do in -Qi, we can compute required by information for sync
database packages. The behavior seems sane; for a given package, the
-Si
required by will show all packages in *any* sync
