Re: [pacman-dev] implement .so dependencies?

2010-02-05 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 06.02.2010 01:00, schrieb Florian Pritz: > For the arch part a better way to find the arch of the lib would be > nice. Neither readelf nor objdump seem to fit. Readelf only shows 32/64 > and objdump shows i686 libs as i368. If anyone has an idea please share. Technically, i686 is i386, just a r

Re: [pacman-dev] implement .so dependencies?

2010-02-05 Thread Florian Pritz
On 02/04/2010 04:38 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > I disagree in the "arch" part. It might not be as important now, but in > the future it could cause problems if we end up havnig multiple > architecture libraries in one system (and ultimately I want to make that > possible, if I ever get to it). If w