[pacman-dev] [GIT] The official pacman repository branch, master, updated. v3.3.3-178-gf03f090

2010-05-14 Thread Dan McGee
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project The official pacman repository. The branch, master has been updated via f03f09011f878ad0b3aea05602a1cb0a11d839e1 (commit) via

[pacman-dev] [PATCH] Fix a serious bug in the download code

2010-05-14 Thread Nagy Gabor
After commit df99495b82 pacman downloaded files from the first repo only, and reported corrupted packages for all files from other repos. The download_size was set to 0 for _all_ transaction packages after downloading some files from the first repo. This code-block was moved to its correct place.

Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH] Fix a serious bug in the download code

2010-05-14 Thread Dan McGee
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Nagy Gabor ng...@bibl.u-szeged.hu wrote: After commit df99495b82 pacman downloaded files from the first repo only, and reported corrupted packages for all files from other repos. The download_size was set to 0 for _all_ transaction packages after downloading

Re: [pacman-dev] Fwd: [PATCH] rankmirrors: Add a --repo option to target a specific repo

2010-05-14 Thread Dan McGee
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Daenyth Blank daenyth+a...@gmail.com wrote: ---  scripts/rankmirrors.sh.in |   19 ++-  1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) This is still busted, unfortunately. :/ 1. No Signed-off-by line. 2. Still base64 encoded. 3. Tabs got

Re: [pacman-dev] NEWS for 3.4.0 - very, very draft

2010-05-14 Thread Gan Lu
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Nagy Gabor ng...@bibl.u-szeged.hu wrote: That's an interesting git command, but shouldn't you use maint or v3.3.3 rather than v3.3.0 ? And maybe it's better to look at the bug tracker for finding the most important and visible changes :