On 16/05/10 21:07, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
On Sun, 16 May 2010 10:13:46 +1000
Allan McRaeal...@archlinux.org wrote:
You should commit patches with -s so that you get the signoff line.
aye! but i wonder what the relevancy of the signoff is. does it just
mean i tested it and approve this
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 16/05/10 21:07, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
On Sun, 16 May 2010 10:13:46 +1000
Allan McRaeal...@archlinux.org wrote:
You should commit patches with -s so that you get the signoff line.
aye! but i wonder what the
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Jonathan Conder j...@skurvy.no-ip.org wrote:
Fixes FS#18770, and hopefully an occasional deadlock in my frontend as well.
This introduces a new EVENT: PM_TRANS_EVT_SCRIPTLET_ERROR, and moves all
scriptlet-related callbacks into the parent process.
I modelled
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Conder j...@skurvy.no-ip.org
---
lib/libalpm/sync.c | 16 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/libalpm/sync.c b/lib/libalpm/sync.c
index d9f4c28..9e140dc 100644
--- a/lib/libalpm/sync.c
+++ b/lib/libalpm/sync.c
@@
Hi
On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 14:54 +0200, Nagy Gabor wrote:
The spirit of this patch is better, but it is still not perfect, because
of the -Sw (PM_TRANS_FLAG_DOWNLOADONLY) case. That return(0) can also be
changed to goto error, and I can see one more RET_ERR in the function.
See my other patch
On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 14:02 +0200, Xavier Chantry wrote:
It sounds fine to distinguish both and might be the cleanest solution,
but I have two questions :
1) Do applications (in particular the ones used in scriptlets) have a
consistent usage of stdout and stderr ?
2) How would frontend
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Jonathan Conder j...@skurvy.no-ip.org wrote:
Maybe you're right, and it would probably make sense if someone wanted
to write a log of pacman output, they could use instead of .
However, Allan seemed to imply that this wasn't the best solution,
although I
Hi
On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 14:54 +0200, Nagy Gabor wrote:
The spirit of this patch is better, but it is still not perfect, because
of the -Sw (PM_TRANS_FLAG_DOWNLOADONLY) case. That return(0) can also be
changed to goto error, and I can see one more RET_ERR in the function.
See my other
This patch fixes the phonon/qt issue, if all to-be-upgraded packages are
explicit targets (ie. only not-yet-installed packages are pulled by
resolvedeps). This condition covers the most common situations, for example
it should hold with every -Su operation.
After this patch sync405.py passes, but
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 00:50 +0200, Xavier Chantry wrote:
I am pretty sure there was no hidden meaning in what Allan wrote, i.e.
no preference for the simple or the complex solution.
Just that even for simple solutions, it's always nice to have patches :)
Ok, in that case I suggest combining
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 01:17 +0200, Nagy Gabor wrote:
Yes, I agree, it would be nice to refactor our download code. Then we could
do
this unset stuff in a more clever way. In addition, we could finally
drop this ugly PM_TRANS_FLAG_DOWNLOADONLY flag, and allow the front-end
to do the
11 matches
Mail list logo
