On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Carlos Diaz 839...@gmail.com wrote:
Populate $cur and $prev with the new bash-completion 1.2 function,
_get_comp_words_by_ref.
Hmm. So if this was just added, do we figure most people would have
upgraded? I don't want to switch to something if Arch is the only
On 14/10/10 16:13, Dan McGee wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Carlos Diaz839...@gmail.com wrote:
Populate $cur and $prev with the new bash-completion 1.2 function,
_get_comp_words_by_ref.
Hmm. So if this was just added, do we figure most people would have
upgraded? I don't want to
$ pacman -Uh
options:
-b, --dbpath path set an alternate database location
-d, --nodeps skip dependency checks
-f, --force force install, overwrite conflicting files
-k, --dbonly only modify database entries, not package files
-r, --root pathset an alternate
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry chantry.xav...@gmail.com
---
test/pacman/tests/sync-sdd1.py | 18 ++
test/pacman/tests/sync-sdd2.py | 15 +++
test/pacman/tests/sync-sdd3.py | 15 +++
test/pacman/tests/sync-sdd4.py | 17 +
4 files
From: Florian Pritz bluew...@xssn.at
-dd ignores only the version of a dependency being checked, but not the
package itself.
Signed-off-by: Florian Pritz bluew...@xssn.at
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry chantry.xav...@gmail.com
---
doc/pacman.8.txt |1 +
src/pacman/pacman.c
$ pacman -Uh
options:
-b, --dbpath path set an alternate database location
-d, --nodeps skip dependency checks
-f, --force force install, overwrite conflicting files
-k, --dbonly only modify database entries, not package files
-r, --root pathset an
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Nagy Gabor ng...@bibl.u-szeged.hu wrote:
I like this.
Cool :)
+ /* First skip all spaces in both strings */
+ while(isspace((unsigned char)*s1))
+ s1++;
+ while(isspace((unsigned char)*s2))
+ s2++;
+ /* If we
$ pacman -Uh
options:
-b, --dbpath path set an alternate database location
-d, --nodeps skip dependency checks
-f, --force force install, overwrite conflicting files
-k, --dbonly only modify database entries, not package files
-r, --root pathset an alternate
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Xavier Chantry
chantry.xav...@gmail.com wrote:
diff --git a/src/pacman/pacman.c b/src/pacman/pacman.c
index 7d51124..38d7f6a 100644
--- a/src/pacman/pacman.c
+++ b/src/pacman/pacman.c
@@ -26,8 +26,10 @@
#define PACKAGE_VERSION GIT_VERSION
#endif
This will enable us to use a custom name and/or location of bsdtar
binary in scripts.
Signed-off-by: Nezmer g...@nezmer.info
---
configure.ac |6 ++
contrib/Makefile.am |1 +
contrib/bacman.in |4 ++--
contrib/pacscripts.in |4
This will allow us to build against libarchive wherever It is installed
in the system.
Signed-off-by: Nezmer g...@nezmer.info
---
configure.ac | 10 ++
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 50d4a04..a12adb1 100644
---
Fix white space issues while at it.
Signed-off-by: Nezmer g...@nezmer.info
---
configure.ac |9 ++---
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index a12adb1..312b975 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -398,10 +398,13 @@
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Nezmer g...@nezmer.info wrote:
This will allow us to build against libarchive wherever It is installed
in the system.
Signed-off-by: Nezmer g...@nezmer.info
Why not just do things like this? Less hassle for us to maintain, we
don't do this for any other
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Nezmer g...@nezmer.info wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 09:05:45AM -0500, Dan McGee wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Nezmer g...@nezmer.info wrote:
This will allow us to build against libarchive wherever It is installed
in the system.
Signed-off-by:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
Is the assert stuff you added to be safer? We don't want to use this.
One, they are compiled into nothing if NDEBUG is defined, and two, it
is a bit silly to abort on this condition. cmp(NULL, NULL) ==0, and
then just decide
In some systems, such as Freebsd, the base tput isn't linked against a
terminfo capable ncurses.
This means that there's no portable way to set color, so instead of
guessing, makepkg fallbacks on using legacy termcap output manipulation.
For reference, see terminfo(5) and termcap(5) for a
The escape string isn't necesarily \033; it's determined by what the
particular termcap/info entry for that terminal contains.
Bash uses ncurses functions to expand \e to the _correct_ terminal
escape.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Diaz 839...@gmail.com
---
scripts/makepkg.sh.in | 12 ++--
1
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Carlos Diaz 839...@gmail.com wrote:
The escape string isn't necesarily \033; it's determined by what the
particular termcap/info entry for that terminal contains.
Bash uses ncurses functions to expand \e to the _correct_ terminal
escape.
Signed-off-by:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Carlos Diaz 839...@gmail.com wrote:
The escape string isn't necesarily \033; it's determined by what the
particular termcap/info entry for that terminal contains.
Bash uses ncurses functions
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:02:45PM -0430, Carlos Diaz wrote:
In some systems, such as Freebsd, the base tput isn't linked against a
terminfo capable ncurses.
This means that there's no portable way to set color, so instead of
guessing, makepkg fallbacks on using legacy termcap output
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Nezmer g...@nezmer.info wrote:
This is already fixed in master!
Err, this was done against master 2010-10-13 23:42 de5f438aef1
And what as I read from [1], you're still using terminfo capability
names and hardcoded shell escapes.
1:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Nezmer g...@nezmer.info wrote:
If you're running FreeBSD. The default $TERM in ttyvint is cons25(1) and
it can handle the colours just fine. So I don't know how the hard-coded
list is relevant.
(1) I heard this vintage default will change soon.
There's
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Dan McGee d...@archlinux.org wrote:
We weren't reading this in from our packages, thus causing us not to write
it out to our local database. Adding this now will help ease the upgrade
path for epoch later and not require reinstallation of all force packages.
Sent this to Andres, forwarding...
- Forwarded message from Nezmer g...@nezmer.info -
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 20:34:15 +0300
From: Nezmer g...@nezmer.info
To: Andres Perera andre...@zoho.com
Subject: Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH 1/3] makepkg: fallback to legacy termcap
capabilities
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Nezmer g...@nezmer.info wrote:
Sent this to Andres, forwarding...
- Forwarded message from Nezmer g...@nezmer.info -
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 20:34:15 +0300
From: Nezmer g...@nezmer.info
To: Andres Perera andre...@zoho.com
Subject: Re: [pacman-dev]
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Xavier Chantry
chantry.xav...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Dan McGee d...@archlinux.org wrote:
We weren't reading this in from our packages, thus causing us not to write
it out to our local database. Adding this now will help ease the
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 02:55:54PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Nezmer g...@nezmer.info wrote:
Sent this to Andres, forwarding...
- Forwarded message from Nezmer g...@nezmer.info -
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 20:34:15 +0300
From: Nezmer
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Nezmer g...@nezmer.info wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 02:55:54PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Nezmer g...@nezmer.info wrote:
Sent this to Andres, forwarding...
- Forwarded message from Nezmer g...@nezmer.info -
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 04:56:17PM +0300, Nezmer wrote:
This will enable us to use a custom name and/or location of bsdtar
binary in scripts.
Signed-off-by: Nezmer g...@nezmer.info
---
configure.ac |6 ++
contrib/Makefile.am |1 +
contrib/bacman.in
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
And in any case at all, do people actually *need* color? I'm thinking
not and that patching some of this stuff might just be adding
complexity for very little benefit.
Finally someone considers this route.
There's a good
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
And in any case at all, do people actually *need* color? I'm thinking
not and that patching some of this stuff might just be adding
complexity for very little benefit.
Finally someone considers this route.
There's a good
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Nezmer g...@nezmer.info wrote:
Let me ask a simple question:
Is there a real-life example where this patch would be beneficial to me
as user?
Is there someone who would like to run the next version of pacman on
a 10 or 15 year old term definition?
cons25 is
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Xavier Chantry
chantry.xav...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Xavier Chantry
chantry.xav...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Dan McGee d...@archlinux.org wrote:
We weren't reading this in from our packages, thus causing us
33 matches
Mail list logo
