[pacman-dev] [PATCH] Add script to update pacman database format

2010-12-08 Thread Allan McRae
The pacman-db-upgrade script was added to detect old pacman database formats and upgrade them. Currently performs the merging of depends files into desc files in the local database. Signed-off-by: Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org --- scripts/Makefile.am |7 +--

Re: [pacman-dev] Misleading info when epoch is used

2010-12-08 Thread Sven-Hendrik Haase
On 08.12.2010 00:40, Dan McGee wrote: On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: On 08/12/10 08:45, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: On 07.12.2010 23:51, Nagy Gabor wrote: $ sudo pacman -Su warning: supertuxkart: local (0.6.2a-2) is newer than community (0.7rc1-1)

Re: [pacman-dev] Misleading info when epoch is used

2010-12-08 Thread Allan McRae
On 08/12/10 22:31, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: On 08.12.2010 00:40, Dan McGee wrote: On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Allan McRaeal...@archlinux.org wrote: On 08/12/10 08:45, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: On 07.12.2010 23:51, Nagy Gabor wrote: $ sudo pacman -Su warning: supertuxkart: local

Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH] Add script to update pacman database format

2010-12-08 Thread Xyne
Allan McRae wrote: The pacman-db-upgrade script was added to detect old pacman database formats and upgrade them. Currently performs the merging of depends files into desc files in the local database. When is this expected to be released? I'll need to update perl-xyne-arch to handle this

Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH] Add script to update pacman database format

2010-12-08 Thread Xyne
Allan McRae wrote: On 09/12/10 00:00, Xyne wrote: Allan McRae wrote: The pacman-db-upgrade script was added to detect old pacman database formats and upgrade them. Currently performs the merging of depends files into desc files in the local database. When is this expected to be

Re: [pacman-dev] Misleading info when epoch is used

2010-12-08 Thread Xavier Chantry
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Nagy Gabor ng...@bibl.u-szeged.hu wrote: In fact I don't like neither force nor epoch. Epoch is just a version prefix, why don't we let the packager to workaround this (KISS)? We can introduce a