Re: [pacman-dev] Warning to pacman-git users - database format change

2010-12-13 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 13.12.2010 05:19, schrieb Allan McRae: Pacman's local database format changes with this commit being pushed to master: commit 21833d90e26635fdd2c6af247790a9bf374b4d80 Author: Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org Date: Sat Oct 30 15:35:43 2010 +1000 Merge desc and depends files in

Re: [pacman-dev] Warning to pacman-git users - database format change

2010-12-13 Thread Allan McRae
On 13/12/10 19:46, Thomas Bächler wrote: Am 13.12.2010 05:19, schrieb Allan McRae: Pacman's local database format changes with this commit being pushed to master: commit 21833d90e26635fdd2c6af247790a9bf374b4d80 Author: Allan McRaeal...@archlinux.org Date: Sat Oct 30 15:35:43 2010 +1000

Re: [pacman-dev] Warning to pacman-git users - database format change

2010-12-13 Thread Xavier Chantry
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 5:19 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: Pacman's local database format changes with this commit being pushed to master: commit 21833d90e26635fdd2c6af247790a9bf374b4d80 Author: Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org Date:   Sat Oct 30 15:35:43 2010 +1000    Merge

Re: [pacman-dev] Warning to pacman-git users - database format change

2010-12-13 Thread Dan McGee
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Xavier Chantry chantry.xav...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 5:19 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote: Pacman's local database format changes with this commit being pushed to master: commit 21833d90e26635fdd2c6af247790a9bf374b4d80 Author:

[pacman-dev] [GIT] The official pacman repository branch, master, updated. v3.4.1-191-g5f36523

2010-12-13 Thread Dan McGee
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project The official pacman repository. The branch, master has been updated via 5f36523af9de20a8c74714da4125bb553b0fae2c (commit) via

Re: [pacman-dev] Misleading info when epoch is used

2010-12-13 Thread Nagy Gabor
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Nagy Gabor ng...@bibl.u-szeged.hu wrote: In fact I don't like neither force nor epoch. Epoch is just a version prefix, why don't we let the packager to workaround this (KISS)? We can

Re: [pacman-dev] Misleading info when epoch is used

2010-12-13 Thread Dan McGee
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Nagy Gabor ng...@bibl.u-szeged.hu wrote: On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Nagy Gabor ng...@bibl.u-szeged.hu wrote: In fact I don't like neither force nor epoch. Epoch is just a version

[pacman-dev] [PATCH] doc/PKGBUILD: document that functions run in -e mode

2010-12-13 Thread Dan McGee
Caught this noted on the forums, but it is definitely worth a note in the manpage as well. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee d...@archlinux.org --- For maint. doc/PKGBUILD.5.txt | 18 +++--- 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/PKGBUILD.5.txt