Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH] Fix handling of ignored packages

2011-03-19 Thread Xavier Chantry
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Pang Yan Han pangyan...@gmail.com wrote: Noted in FS#23342. When the user attempts to install an ignored package and answers no when asked whether to install it, pacman bails out with: error: target not found: packagename This is because satisfiers are not

Re: [pacman-dev] libalpm linked against libarchive/libfetch deps (was: SyncFirst and dependencies)

2011-03-19 Thread Xavier Chantry
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote: Well, it actually is a bit more than just a wrong dependency. ioni and me figured that libalpm 6.0.0 is linked against all libfetch and libarchive dependencies as well whereas 5.0.3 isn't, so there must have been

Re: [pacman-dev] libalpm linked against libarchive/libfetch deps (was: SyncFirst and dependencies)

2011-03-19 Thread Xavier Chantry
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Xavier Chantry chantry.xav...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote: Well, it actually is a bit more than just a wrong dependency. ioni and me figured that libalpm 6.0.0 is linked against all libfetch

[pacman-dev] change to option handling for --debug and -v

2011-03-19 Thread Ray Kohler
I noticed a change in the way 3.5 processes some of its command-line flags: It used to be that --debug and -v were handled immediately, such that their initial output appeared before pacman complained of a usage error. Now, it errors out immediately. This may seem like an unimportant case, but it

Re: [pacman-dev] change to option handling for --debug and -v

2011-03-19 Thread Dave Reisner
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 12:10:58PM -0400, Ray Kohler wrote: I noticed a change in the way 3.5 processes some of its command-line flags: It used to be that --debug and -v were handled immediately, such that their initial output appeared before pacman complained of a usage error. Now, it errors

Re: [pacman-dev] change to option handling for --debug and -v

2011-03-19 Thread Ray Kohler
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote: On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 12:10:58PM -0400, Ray Kohler wrote: I noticed a change in the way 3.5 processes some of its command-line flags: It used to be that --debug and -v were handled immediately, such that their initial

Re: [pacman-dev] libalpm linked against libarchive/libfetch deps (was: SyncFirst and dependencies)

2011-03-19 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:38:13AM +0100, Xavier Chantry wrote: On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Xavier Chantry chantry.xav...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote: Well, it actually is a bit more than just a wrong dependency.

[pacman-dev] [PATCH] Add -Wl,--as-needed to libalpm LDFLAGS.

2011-03-19 Thread Lukas Fleischer
Also includes a Debian patch (from #347650) that makes libtool play nicely with -Wl,--as-needed. Signed-off-by: Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de --- lib/libalpm/Makefile.am |2 +- ltmain.sh | 14 ++ 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff

Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH] Add -Wl,--as-needed to libalpm LDFLAGS.

2011-03-19 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 09:28:34PM +0100, Lukas Fleischer wrote: Also includes a Debian patch (from #347650) that makes libtool play nicely with -Wl,--as-needed. Signed-off-by: Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de --- lib/libalpm/Makefile.am |2 +- ltmain.sh | 14

Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH] Add -Wl,--as-needed to libalpm LDFLAGS.

2011-03-19 Thread Allan McRae
On 20/03/11 06:28, Lukas Fleischer wrote: Also includes a Debian patch (from #347650) that makes libtool play nicely with -Wl,--as-needed. Signed-off-by: Lukas Fleischerarchli...@cryptocrack.de --- lib/libalpm/Makefile.am |2 +- ltmain.sh | 14 ++ 2 files