A non-GNU version of awk may not support the (|...) syntax for
an optional group and require '()' to match an empty string.
The (...)? syntax is more appropriate for this usage.
Signed-off-by: Rémy Oudompheng r...@archlinux.org
---
Problem arises when trying to use makepkg with FreeBSD's awk.
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry chantry.xav...@gmail.com
---
configure.ac |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 3299302..9fb9cb0 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -131,6 +131,9 @@ AC_PATH_PROGS([BASH_SHELL], [bash
That's a funny one, building with optimization levels (with both gcc and
clang) caused open_mode to always be set to ab, which worked.
This was spotted both with clang-analyzer, and by Jakob who reported a
segfault as he was using an un-optimized build.
Maybe we should build with -O0 in debug
I am just curious, what do we need this flag for ?
I only found this :
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Inline.html
GCC implements three different semantics of declaring a function
inline. One is available with -std=gnu89 or -fgnu89-inline or when
gnu_inline attribute is present on all inline
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Xavier Chantry chantry.xav...@gmail.com wrote:
That's a funny one, building with optimization levels (with both gcc and
clang) caused open_mode to always be set to ab, which worked.
This was spotted both with clang-analyzer, and by Jakob who reported a
segfault
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Rémy Oudompheng
remyoudomph...@gmail.com wrote:
There is no reason to not support versions of libarchive that lack
ARCHIVE_COMPRESSION_UU. Distributions should work properly without
this.
Signed-off-by: Rémy Oudompheng r...@archlinux.org
Thanks, applied to
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Rémy Oudompheng
remyoudomph...@gmail.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Rémy Oudompheng r...@archlinux.org
Applied to maint.
---
lib/libalpm/util.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/libalpm/util.c b/lib/libalpm/util.c
index
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Xavier Chantry
chantry.xav...@gmail.com wrote:
I am just curious, what do we need this flag for ?
Searching commits, it wasn't too hard to find this, although I don't
know the full context or relevance. Not sure if it was just a GCC bug
at the time?
commit
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 5:31 AM, Rémy Oudompheng
remyoudomph...@gmail.com wrote:
A non-GNU version of awk may not support the (|...) syntax for
an optional group and require '()' to match an empty string.
The (...)? syntax is more appropriate for this usage.
Signed-off-by: Rémy Oudompheng
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Xavier Chantry
chantry.xav...@gmail.com wrote:
I am just curious, what do we need this flag for ?
Searching commits, it wasn't too hard to find this, although I don't
know the full context or
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Xavier Chantry chantry.xav...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Xavier Chantry
chantry.xav...@gmail.com wrote:
I am just curious, what do we need this flag for ?
Searching
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Rémy Oudompheng
remyoudomph...@gmail.com wrote:
Some systems, like FreeBSD might define both statfs
and statvfs: however if statvfs exists whereas getmntinfo()
uses a statfs struct, the current ifdefs would select the wrong
line of code.
Signed-off-by: Rémy
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry chantry.xav...@gmail.com
---
lib/libalpm/alpm.h |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/libalpm/alpm.h b/lib/libalpm/alpm.h
index b08191d..81877cc 100644
--- a/lib/libalpm/alpm.h
+++ b/lib/libalpm/alpm.h
@@ -254,8 +254,8 @@ int
spotted by clang-analyzer (strcmp with NULL rpath is bad)
Signed-off-by: Xavier Chantry chantry.xav...@gmail.com
---
src/pacman/query.c | 50 +-
1 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/pacman/query.c
On 03/04/11 04:13, Dan McGee wrote:
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 5:31 AM, Rémy Oudompheng
remyoudomph...@gmail.com wrote:
A non-GNU version of awk may not support the (|...) syntax for
an optional group and require '()' to match an empty string.
The (...)? syntax is more appropriate for this usage.
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Xavier Chantry chantry.xav...@gmail.comwrote:
I am just curious, what do we need this flag for ?
I only found this :
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Inline.html
GCC implements three different semantics of declaring a function
inline. One is available with
16 matches
Mail list logo