[pacman-dev] SyncFirst

2012-02-16 Thread Allan McRae
I was thinking about SyncFirst today and decided we need a good summary of what the issues are and why the current and old implementations fail. Why the current (pacman-4.0) implementation fails: When a package in SyncFirst is to be updated, pacman will update that first and pull everything in

Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH] Remove SyncFirst option

2012-02-16 Thread Nagy Gabor
This has outlived its usefulness and causes more problems than it solves. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee d...@archlinux.org --- This is an RFC first of all, so please feel free to comment. Pros: 1. Removes complexity and a fair amount of code. 2. Removes the hack necesary for download-only and print

[pacman-dev] [GIT] The official pacman repository branch, maint, updated. v4.0.2-8-gca41427

2012-02-16 Thread Dan McGee
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project The official pacman repository. The branch, maint has been updated via ca4142714137b16feabac09c4cda86b0a75036f8 (commit) via

[pacman-dev] [PATCH] [RFC] Add configuration option for Upgrade operation SigLevel

2012-02-16 Thread Allan McRae
Add LocalFileSigLevel and RemoteFileSigLevel to control the signature checking for pacman -U file and pacman -U url operations respectively. Both values take the default of Optional TrustedOnly. Signed-off-by: Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org --- I would like to have the default level being what