This set of patches separate the ini parsing from pacman/conf.c into its own
file to make the code reusable for future additions, like parsing config files
for hooks.
The config file gets parsed into a list of ini_section_t which contains the
name of the section and a list of directives which in
This makes the ini parsing code reusable for future additions like
parsing config files for hooks.
Signed-off-by: Sascha Kruse knop...@googlemail.com
---
src/pacman/Makefile.am | 1 +
src/pacman/ini.c | 266 +
src/pacman/ini.h | 46
Signed-off-by: Sascha Kruse knop...@googlemail.com
---
src/pacman/conf.c | 343 ++
1 file changed, 111 insertions(+), 232 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/pacman/conf.c b/src/pacman/conf.c
index 3f1b1c3..06a4612 100644
--- a/src/pacman/conf.c
+++
It looks like make update-po is not adding the plural translations to
the po files. e.g. Looking at the removed strings that are stored at
the bottom of theses files I see:
src/pacman/po/en_GB.po:
#~ msgid %s: %jd total file,
#~ msgid_plural %s: %jd total files,
#~ msgstr[0] %s: %jd total
On 15/03/13 21:27, Allan McRae wrote:
It looks like make update-po is not adding the plural translations to
the po files. e.g. Looking at the removed strings that are stored at
the bottom of theses files I see:
src/pacman/po/en_GB.po:
#~ msgid %s: %jd total file,
#~ msgid_plural %s:
Be complete with files listed. Comment out files where code is used
or heavily based on other projects so will never have translatable
strings.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org
---
BAH! The change of importance here is the addition of src/pacman/check.c
which has a few strings in
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
Be complete with files listed. Comment out files where code is used
or heavily based on other projects so will never have translatable
strings.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org
---
Looks good to me.
BAH!
We are almost done with the .de version, but there are at least two
show-stoppers - I simply cannot figure out what it means.
%s optionally requires %s\n
I assume that we are talking about packages, but even if I should be
wrong, I do not really see how something optional can be required.
And in
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 04:28:09PM +0100, Matthias Gorissen wrote:
We are almost done with the .de version, but there are at least two
show-stoppers - I simply cannot figure out what it means.
%s optionally requires %s\n
I assume that we are talking about packages, but even if I should be
Am 15.03.2013 16:42, schrieb William Giokas:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 04:28:09PM +0100, Matthias Gorissen wrote:
We are almost done with the .de version, but there are at least two
show-stoppers - I simply cannot figure out what it means.
%s optionally requires %s\n
I assume that we are
On 03/14/13 at 06:32pm, Connor Behan wrote:
On 14/03/13 03:25 PM, Andrew Gregory wrote:
On 03/14/13 at 12:40pm, Connor Behan wrote:
I could modify the patch so that it limits ignorepkg to packages beside
--ignore rather than clearing it. I could also check the command line
arguments so
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Sascha Kruse knop...@googlemail.comwrote:
This makes the ini parsing code reusable for future additions like
parsing config files for hooks.
Signed-off-by: Sascha Kruse knop...@googlemail.com
---
src/pacman/Makefile.am | 1 +
src/pacman/ini.c | 266
On 15/03/13 04:49 PM, Andrew Gregory wrote:
On 03/14/13 at 06:32pm, Connor Behan wrote:
On 14/03/13 03:25 PM, Andrew Gregory wrote:
On 03/14/13 at 12:40pm, Connor Behan wrote:
I could modify the patch so that it limits ignorepkg to packages beside
--ignore rather than clearing it. I could
13 matches
Mail list logo
