On 12/5/20 12:27 am, guilla...@manjaro.org wrote:
> Hi Allan, Hi Anatol,
>
> I was looking to this new multiplexed implementation and I found some
> problems:
> 1) This implementation can lead to download databases from different
> servers, I think it can't be a problem if they are not synced
As
On 12/5/20 3:14 am, guilla...@manjaro.org wrote:
> Le 2020-05-11 17:10, Eli Schwartz a écrit :
>> On 5/11/20 10:27 AM, guilla...@manjaro.org wrote:
>>> Hi Allan, Hi Anatol,
>>>
>>> I was looking to this new multiplexed implementation and I found some
>>> problems:
>>> 1) This implementation can
Hello Guillaume
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 7:51 AM wrote:
>
> Hi Allan, Hi Anatol,
>
> I was looking to this new multiplexed implementation and I found some
> problems:
> 1) This implementation can lead to download databases from different
> servers, I think it can't be a problem if they are not
All users of _alpm_download() have been refactored to the new API.
It is time to remove the old _alpm_download() functionality now.
This change also removes obsolete SIGPIPE signal handler functionality
(this is a leftover from libfetch days).
Signed-off-by: Anatol Pomozov
---
On 5/11/20 10:27 AM, guilla...@manjaro.org wrote:
> Hi Allan, Hi Anatol,
>
> I was looking to this new multiplexed implementation and I found some
> problems:
> 1) This implementation can lead to download databases from different
> servers, I think it can't be a problem if they are not synced
Hi Allan, Hi Anatol,
I was looking to this new multiplexed implementation and I found some
problems:
1) This implementation can lead to download databases from different
servers, I think it can't be a problem if they are not synced
2) Differents download payloads are created for databases and
On 5/11/20 9:01 AM, wwijs...@live.nl wrote:
> Right now an unpatched pacman almost works for my use case, but there
> still is one issue with building it. Currently ninja will install the
> bash-completion scripts system wide, regardless of which user runs
> ninja install or what the prefix is.
On Mon, 2020-05-11 at 12:42 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 8/5/20 4:13 am, Wouter Wijsman wrote:
> > Currently makepkg requires pacman and pacman-conf to be in the path
> > of
> > the user. Since these executables should never move, it should be
> > safe
> > to add the full paths to the scripts at
Installing remote packages using its URL is an interesting case for ALPM
API. Unlike package sync ('pacman -S pkg1 pkg2') '-U' does not deal with
server mirror list. Thus _alpm_multi_download() should be able to
handle file download for payloads that either have 'fileurl' field
or pair of fields
