On 4/9/20 12:40 pm, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> On 9/2/20 11:02 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
>> Pacman now downloads the signature files for all packages when present in a
>> repository. That makes distributing signatures within repository databases
>> redundant and costly.
>>
>> Do not distribute the package
On 9/2/20 10:47 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> FS#61661 notes that we have a comment "Defaults" value for BUILDENV and
> OPTIONS
> but that does not necessarily correspond to what the example makepkg.conf
> sets.
>
> Change the comment to "Makepkg defaults" to indicate this is what makepkg will
> do u
On 9/2/20 11:02 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Pacman now downloads the signature files for all packages when present in a
> repository. That makes distributing signatures within repository databases
> redundant and costly.
>
> Do not distribute the package signature files within the repo databases by
On 4/9/20 12:24 pm, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> On 9/3/20 9:38 PM, Andrew Gregory wrote:
>> On 08/21/20 at 08:20pm, Ronan Pigott wrote:
>>> From: Ronan Pigott
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ronan Pigott
>>
>> Sure, I guess. pacman-conf is meant for use in scripts; who on Earth
>> is running it in a terminal?
On Thu Sep 3, 2020 at 11:38 AM MST, Andrew Gregory wrote:
>
> Sure, I guess. pacman-conf is meant for use in scripts; who on Earth
> is running it in a terminal?
I dunno. Anything useful in scripts can be useful in an interactive
shell. No one is gonna bother without completions though.
I wanted
On 9/3/20 9:38 PM, Andrew Gregory wrote:
> On 08/21/20 at 08:20pm, Ronan Pigott wrote:
>> From: Ronan Pigott
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ronan Pigott
>
> Sure, I guess. pacman-conf is meant for use in scripts; who on Earth
> is running it in a terminal?
It can be pretty useful for running without opt
On 31/8/20 6:23 am, Andrew Gregory wrote:
> On 08/24/20 at 10:34pm, Daan De Meyer wrote:
>>> What about adding Include support to hooks? Then hooks that need this
>>> type of functionality could explicitly include trigger files from
>>> a particular directory, insulating the process from simple ho
On 08/21/20 at 08:20pm, Ronan Pigott wrote:
> From: Ronan Pigott
>
> Signed-off-by: Ronan Pigott
Sure, I guess. pacman-conf is meant for use in scripts; who on Earth
is running it in a terminal?
On 09/03/20 at 12:17pm, Damjan Georgievski wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Aug 2020 at 19:13, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> >
> > On 8/30/20 1:07 PM, Дамјан Георгиевски wrote:
> > > I have had at least two or three use cases for this option,
> > > * one has been since I always have to type
> > > pacman -Syu --assum
On 09/01/20 at 03:50pm, Cameron Katri wrote:
> I believe I found a more portable solution. We use signal(SIGPIPE,
> SIG_IGN); which will block SIGPIPE, and if MSG_NOSIGNAL is not
> supported we set it to 0x0 so that it just gets ignored. Hopefully
> this is a more comprehensive solution.
...
>
On Sun, 30 Aug 2020 at 19:13, Eli Schwartz wrote:
>
> On 8/30/20 1:07 PM, Дамјан Георгиевски wrote:
> > I have had at least two or three use cases for this option,
> > * one has been since I always have to type
> > pacman -Syu --assume-installed noto-fonts when plasma-integration is
> > updated
11 matches
Mail list logo
