On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 11:03:06 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> These are strong arguments to keep the current default. Particularly
> given there is nothing wrong with the current default at the moment, and
> you can initialize your pacman keyring "by hand" if you really are
> concerned.
How
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 16:30:19 -0500, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> Currently pacman assumes gpgme from >= the year 2010, is that sufficient
> to read ed25519? (idk, it's shelling out to gpg and thus likely doesn't
> care?) Maybe we should bump this anyway in the expectation that requiring
> a ~2015
Larger RSA keys are not the way forward, switch to ed25519 instead.
This will also become the default in the next version of GnuPG.
Signed-off-by: Geert Hendrickx
---
scripts/pacman-key.sh.in | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/pacman-key.sh.in
