These patches add support for client certificates to alpm and pacman.
This can already be achieved currently by setting an XferCommand,
but doing so significantly reduces the quality of the feedback pacman
gives during the downloads. Especially annoying are the 404 errors on
most database signatur
---
etc/pacman.conf.in | 2 ++
src/pacman/conf.c | 22 ++
src/pacman/conf.h | 2 ++
3 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
diff --git a/etc/pacman.conf.in b/etc/pacman.conf.in
index 8e967fbb..3285e8ae 100644
--- a/etc/pacman.conf.in
+++ b/etc/pacman.conf.in
@@ -16,6 +16,8 @@
#
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 17:51, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> On 11/14/18 11:37 AM, Maarten de Vries wrote:
> > These patches add support for client certificates to alpm and pacman.
> >
> > This can already be achieved currently by setting an XferCommand,
> > but doing so signif
On 14-11-2018 18:04, Maarten de Vries wrote:
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 17:51, Eli Schwartz <mailto:eschwa...@archlinux.org>> wrote:
On 11/14/18 11:37 AM, Maarten de Vries wrote:
> These patches add support for client certificates to alpm and
pacman.
>
> T
On 28-11-18 05:08, Allan McRae wrote:
On 15/11/18 2:37 am, Maarten de Vries wrote:
These patches add support for client certificates to alpm and pacman.
This can already be achieved currently by setting an XferCommand,
but doing so significantly reduces the quality of the feedback pacman
gives
On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 at 19:42, Maarten de Vries wrote:
>
> On 28-11-18 05:08, Allan McRae wrote:
> > On 15/11/18 2:37 am, Maarten de Vries wrote:
> >> These patches add support for client certificates to alpm and pacman.
> >>
> >> This can already be achie
On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 at 12:19, Richard Dodd wrote:
>
> I'm just trying to get a mathematically sound implementation of all the
> properties (traits in rust parlance) that the version exhibits. If there is
> an equivalence relation and a hash function as above, then I can store
> versions in a hash
On Sun, 7 Apr 2019 at 21:02, Andrew Gregory wrote:
>
> On 04/06/19 at 04:43pm, Nathan Aclander wrote:
> > Using this patch seemed more usable for me than to having to comment out
> > mirrors manually depending my network conditions. Are you concerned that
> > having this parameter be tunable would
