Here are some output of the patch just sent to the ML.
$ pacman -Sp --print-format %r/%n-%v : %l [%s] kdelibs
extra/qt-4.5.2-6 :
http://mir1.archlinuxfr.org/archlinux/extra/os/i686/qt-4.5.2-6-i686.pkg.tar.gz
[28914122]
extra/ilmbase-1.0.1-1 :
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Nagy Gaborng...@bibl.u-szeged.hu wrote:
Here are some output of the patch just sent to the ML.
$ pacman -Sp --print-format %r/%n-%v : %l [%s] kdelibs
extra/qt-4.5.2-6 :
http://mir1.archlinuxfr.org/archlinux/extra/os/i686/qt-4.5.2-6-i686.pkg.tar.gz
[28914122]
Here are some output of the patch just sent to the ML.
$ pacman -Sp --print-format %r/%n-%v : %l [%s] kdelibs
extra/qt-4.5.2-6 :
http://mir1.archlinuxfr.org/archlinux/extra/os/i686/qt-4.5.2-6-i686.pkg.tar.gz
[28914122]
extra/ilmbase-1.0.1-1 :
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3:50 AM, Xynex...@archlinux.ca wrote:
Instead of adding several options, wouldn't it be possible to let -p
accept a string argument with formatting information similar to the way
the date command works. This would be extensible in the future and
could include the
Instead of adding several options, wouldn't it be possible to let -p
accept a string argument with formatting information similar to the way
the date command works. This would be extensible in the future and
could include the following interpretted sequences (among others)
%u - url
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Xynex...@archlinux.ca wrote:
I think using local for %r is a good idea. As for %u, maybe it
should be changed to % l for location. It could return the full
path to the package archive when using -U. It's relatively useless for
-R but I agree that it should
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3:50 AM, Xynex...@archlinux.ca wrote:
Instead of adding several options, wouldn't it be possible to let -p
accept a string argument with formatting information similar to the way
the date command works. This would be extensible in the future and
could include the
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3:49 AM, Xynex...@archlinux.ca wrote:
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 15:20:03 +0200
Xavier shinin...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a preliminary patch for this. I am not really happy with the C
code I wrote for doing the substitutions, but it works.
Does it make any sense to have this
Instead of adding several options, wouldn't it be possible to let -p
accept a string argument with formatting information similar to the way
the date command works. This would be extensible in the future and
could include the following interpretted sequences (among others)
%u - url
%n -
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 5:16 AM, Xynex...@archlinux.ca wrote:
--print-pkg and --print-uris looks good to me
but would you keep your new feature on top of these two options :
--print-pkg and --print-uris only show non-download packages
--print-pkg --print-pkg and --print-uris --print-uris show
Instead of adding several options, wouldn't it be possible to let -p
accept a string argument with formatting information similar to the way
the date command works. This would be extensible in the future and
could include the following interpretted sequences (among others)
%u - url
--print-pkg and --print-uris looks good to me
but would you keep your new feature on top of these two options :
--print-pkg and --print-uris only show non-download packages
--print-pkg --print-pkg and --print-uris --print-uris show all
?
an alternative :
what if we added the download
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 5:45 AM, Laszlo Pappdjsza...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Xavier!
I didn't have so much time at the weekend, but as I saw maybe it would be
better to choose a more talkative name for it, e.g. --print-package or
something (it's just an example).
What will happen if there
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Xavier shinin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 5:45 AM, Laszlo Pappdjsza...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Xavier!
I didn't have so much time at the weekend, but as I saw maybe it would be
better to choose a more talkative
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Laszlo Pappdjsza...@gmail.com wrote:
--print-pkg and --print-uris looks good to me
Me too, but it would be nice to keep the older -Sp option for --print-uris,
because everybody know it so :)
I didn't mean to drop it
but would you keep your new feature on
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 9:04 PM, Xavier shinin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Laszlo Pappdjsza...@gmail.com wrote:
--print-pkg and --print-uris looks good to me
Me too, but it would be nice to keep the older -Sp option for
--print-uris,
because everybody know
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Laszlo Pappdjsza...@gmail.com wrote:
But since --print-pkgs is only a long option, we would need to use
--print-pkg --print-pkg which is very ugly ...
Is it clearer now ?
--print-pkgs seems fine for me, the later one isn't so beautiful in fact,
but when i
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Xavier shinin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Laszlo Pappdjsza...@gmail.com wrote:
But since --print-pkgs is only a long option, we would need to use
--print-pkg --print-pkg which is very ugly ...
Is it clearer now ?
--print-pkgs
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 12:52 AM, Xavier shinin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 12:31 AM, Laszlo Pappdjsza...@gmail.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Papp djsza...@gmail.com
---
src/pacman/pacman.c |2 +-
src/pacman/sync.c |3 +++
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+),
+ if ((config-op_s_printuris = 2) !alpm_pkg_download_size(pkg)) {
+ continue;
+}
This means that -Sp prints everything, -Spp prints only the
to-be-download URIs. This is good for backward compatibility, but for
my taste -Sp should print only the to-be-download URIs, and -Spp all.
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Nagy Gabor ng...@bibl.u-szeged.hu wrote:
+ if ((config-op_s_printuris = 2) !alpm_pkg_download_size(pkg)) {
+ continue;
+}
This means that -Sp prints everything, -Spp prints only the to-be-download
URIs. This is good for backward compatibility, but
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Papp djsza...@gmail.com
---
src/pacman/pacman.c |2 +-
src/pacman/sync.c |3 +++
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/pacman/pacman.c b/src/pacman/pacman.c
index 25647b5..00b14f5 100644
--- a/src/pacman/pacman.c
+++
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 12:31 AM, Laszlo Pappdjsza...@gmail.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Papp djsza...@gmail.com
---
src/pacman/pacman.c | 2 +-
src/pacman/sync.c | 3 +++
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/pacman/pacman.c b/src/pacman/pacman.c
23 matches
Mail list logo
