Hm. The concept is wrong, sorry. alpm/conflict.c may swap the
conflicting targets, so it can happen that this prints "foo conflicts
with bar (bar)", which is odd. I will rework this soon (if I can), atm
this patch is revoked.
typo: "foo conflicts with bar (foo)"
Fixed in my working branch:
h
> Hm. The concept is wrong, sorry. alpm/conflict.c may swap the
> conflicting targets, so it can happen that this prints "foo conflicts
> with bar (bar)", which is odd. I will rework this soon (if I can), atm
> this patch is revoked.
typo: "foo conflicts with bar (foo)"
> + if(!strcmp(package2, reason)) {
> + printf(_(":: %s: conflicts with
> %s\n"), package1, package2);
> + } else {
> + printf(_(":: %s: c
>From 841439f2d5d8c8e750d7abe186a22f53f7f87729 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nagy Gabor
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:20:18 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add a new reason field to pmconflict_t struct
Sometimes "foo conflicts with bar" information is not enough, see this
thread: http://bbs.archlinux.org/vie
