On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Roman Kyrylych
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> the old vercmp also maintains backwards compatibility,
> i.e. packages that used to have options=('force') (e.g. samba) will
> still have it,
> and packages that used to not have options=('force') when using
> *{rc,beta,
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Nagy Gabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Yes. And in Xavier's link there is a "Problems with Dependencies"
>> paragraph. So it is required to minimize force/epoch in order to
>> calculate 'foo>=1.3-1' dependencies correctly. Question: any foo
>> package with forc
>
> Yes. And in Xavier's link there is a "Problems with Dependencies"
> paragraph. So it is required to minimize force/epoch in order to
> calculate 'foo>=1.3-1' dependencies correctly. Question: any foo
> package with force will satisfy this. Right?
>
Wrong. alpm_depcmp uses versioncmp instead o
> 2008/6/20 Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > 2008/6/20 Nagy Gabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>
> >> You may trust rpm guys, but don't forget that rpm based distros
> >> usually use different versioning scheme, so '1.0b versus 1.0' is
> >> not a real life example there:
> >> alsa-lib-1.0.14-0.4.rc3.fc7.
2008/6/20 Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/6/20 Nagy Gabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> You may trust rpm guys, but don't forget that rpm based distros usually
>> use different versioning scheme, so '1.0b versus 1.0' is not a real
>> life example there:
>> alsa-lib-1.0.14-0.4.rc3.fc7.i386.rpm (Fedo
2008/6/20 Nagy Gabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> You may trust rpm guys, but don't forget that rpm based distros usually
> use different versioning scheme, so '1.0b versus 1.0' is not a real
> life example there:
> alsa-lib-1.0.14-0.4.rc3.fc7.i386.rpm (Fedora)
> mplayer-1.0-0.20.pre7.0.rh9.rf.i386.rpm
Fri, 20 Jun 2008 06:09:37 -0500 -n
"Dan McGee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> írta:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 3:46 AM, Nagy Gabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> ---
> >> doc/PKGBUILD.5.txt |3 ++-
> >> doc/pacman.8.txt |8 +++-
> >> 2 files
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> But what is the expected behavior for a2ps with the 'c' in there? Does
> 4.13 come before 4.13b? You are saying "I don't like this" without a
> whole lot of justification and you even gave me a converse example as
> far as I
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 3:46 AM, Nagy Gabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> ---
>> doc/PKGBUILD.5.txt |3 ++-
>> doc/pacman.8.txt |8 +++-
>> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/doc/PKGBUILD.5.txt b/doc/PKG
> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> doc/PKGBUILD.5.txt |3 ++-
> doc/pacman.8.txt |8 +++-
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/doc/PKGBUILD.5.txt b/doc/PKGBUILD.5.txt
> index b90d67a..0b1ce64 100644
> --- a/doc/PKGBUILD.5.txt
> +++
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
doc/PKGBUILD.5.txt |3 ++-
doc/pacman.8.txt |8 +++-
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/PKGBUILD.5.txt b/doc/PKGBUILD.5.txt
index b90d67a..0b1ce64 100644
--- a/doc/PKGBUILD.5.txt
+++ b/doc/PKGBUILD.5.txt
11 matches
Mail list logo
