On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 4:50 AM, Allan McRaeal...@archlinux.org wrote:
Imho your noyes default behavior is better... Moreover, maybe we should
also print somehow the conflict itself in warning, because 'udev
conflicts with initscripts2009.07' (btw, why is there 2 conflicts line
udev's
From 66cb7b5d48ae173944531318022d351f4e503172 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nagy Gabor ng...@bibl.u-szeged.hu
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:54:51 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Do not remove conflict by default
When a conflict is detected, pacman asks if the user wants to remove
the conflicting package. In
When a conflict is detected, pacman asks if the user wants to remove
the conflicting package. In many cases this is a bad idea. e.g.
udev conflicts with initscripts. Remove initscripts [Y/n]
util-linux-ng conflicts with e2fsprogs. Remove e2fsprogs? [Y/n]
This changes the query to [y/N].
When a conflict is detected, pacman asks if the user wants to remove
the conflicting package. In many cases this is a bad idea. e.g.
udev conflicts with initscripts. Remove initscripts [Y/n]
util-linux-ng conflicts with e2fsprogs. Remove e2fsprogs? [Y/n]
This changes the query to [y/N].
Nagy Gabor wrote:
When a conflict is detected, pacman asks if the user wants to remove
the conflicting package. In many cases this is a bad idea. e.g.
udev conflicts with initscripts. Remove initscripts [Y/n]
util-linux-ng conflicts with e2fsprogs. Remove e2fsprogs? [Y/n]
This changes the
