On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Dan McGeed...@archlinux.org wrote:
OK, that last one looks a bit silly with the paths at the top, doesn't it. Any
ideas? I'd be fine with showing the 0 errors lines all the time, it would just
require some grep foo for people to screen those out. That way, you
changaco wrote :
From ee827c85cb9c4cd42ff42d8d624923076d62459b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Charly COSTE chang...@laposte.net
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:48:15 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] New feature: files verification
A new option -Qk which checks if the files owned by a/some/all package(s)
Loui Chang wrote :
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 12:46:22AM +0200, changaco wrote:
Not even a little message to tell me if there are things I still need
to work on ?
Seems pacman-dev is in vacation mode, or I suspect that they are busy
with some other things lately. :D
Ok, thx. ;)
changaco wrote :
changaco wrote :
From ee827c85cb9c4cd42ff42d8d624923076d62459b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Charly COSTE chang...@laposte.net
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:48:15 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] New feature: files verification
A new option -Qk which checks if the files owned
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 12:46:22AM +0200, changaco wrote:
Not even a little message to tell me if there are things I still need
to work on ?
Seems pacman-dev is in vacation mode, or I suspect that they are busy
with some other things lately. :D
___
changaco wrote :
From ee827c85cb9c4cd42ff42d8d624923076d62459b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Charly COSTE chang...@laposte.net
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:48:15 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] New feature: files verification
A new option -Qk which checks if the files owned by a/some/all package(s)
changaco schrieb:
What has files in /tmp?
Well they are temporary files so you can't consider that the package is damaged
if they are not here.
I added this because of some fonts package which has files in /tmp.
If a package has files in /tmp, it should be reported here, as it is
definitely
Allan McRae wrote :
Eric Bélanger wrote:
2009/3/30 Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org:
changaco wrote:
What has files in /tmp?
Well they are temporary files so you can't consider that the package is
damaged if they are not here.
I added this because of some
Dan McGee wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:21 AM, changaco chang...@laposte.net wrote:
Allan McRae wrote :
Eric Bélanger wrote:
2009/3/30 Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org:
changaco wrote:
What has files in /tmp?
Well they are temporary files so you can't
Dan McGee wrote :
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 3:50 PM, changaco chang...@laposte.net wrote:
+*-k \--check*::
+ Check that the files owned by the package(s) are present on the
system,
+ that they haven't been deleted. Given no argument it will check all
the
+ packages
From ee827c85cb9c4cd42ff42d8d624923076d62459b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Charly COSTE chang...@laposte.net
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:48:15 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] New feature: files verification
A new option -Qk which checks if the files owned by a/some/all package(s)
really are on the
It would probably also be best to use a format like we do in
callback.c, line 399, which is something like this:
checking package integrity...
(1/1) checking for file conflicts [#]
100%
(1/1) installing emacs
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 3:50 PM, changaco chang...@laposte.net wrote:
It would probably also be best to use a format like we do in
callback.c, line 399, which is something like this:
checking package integrity...
(1/1) checking for file conflicts
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 8:52 AM, changaco chang...@laposte.net wrote:
From 7c0348fa499f55968764fef4c7bb3d3d7245932b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Charly COSTE chang...@laposte.net
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:36:23 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] New feature: files verification
A new option
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
$ ./src/pacman/.libs/lt-pacman -Qy glibc pacman-git
glibc 2.9-4
pacman-git 20090116-1
file n°1512 (package 2/2): OK
No damaged packages.
We should probably only do verification and not print the names of the
packages and
Dan McGee wrote :
1. Please enable the pre-commit hook in git:
mv .git/hooks/pre-commit.sample .git/hooks/pre-commit
This will ensure you don't have the following that I caught when
applying the patch locally:
dmc...@galway ~/projects/pacman (master)
$ git am -3 /tmp/pacman-verify.patch
16 matches
Mail list logo
