On 10/6/19 6:50 am, Andrew Gregory wrote:
> ---
>
> A few changes I omitted from the initial patch.
>
> Does anybody know what usepart was for? It was unset unless %o was
> used in XferCommand, but I'm not sure what the use case for an
> XferCommand without %o would be.
>
According to the man
On 06/11/19 at 11:06am, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 10/6/19 6:50 am, Andrew Gregory wrote:
> > Does anybody know what usepart was for? It was unset unless %o was
> > used in XferCommand, but I'm not sure what the use case for an
> > XferCommand without %o would be.
>
> When %o was added, there were c
On 10/6/19 6:50 am, Andrew Gregory wrote:
> Does anybody know what usepart was for? It was unset unless %o was
> used in XferCommand, but I'm not sure what the use case for an
> XferCommand without %o would be.
When %o was added, there were cases in the wild where users had a
downloader that did
---
A few changes I omitted from the initial patch.
Does anybody know what usepart was for? It was unset unless %o was
used in XferCommand, but I'm not sure what the use case for an
XferCommand without %o would be.
src/pacman/conf.c | 11 ---
test/pacman/tests/sync200
