The checking of the package for $srcdir references was overly
sensitive and gave a lot of what appear to be false positives with
binary files (in particular with debugging symbols kept).
Restrict the search for $srcdir to non-binary files as this should
still catch the majority of configuration is
Am Mittwoch, den 29.09.2010, 21:59 +1000 schrieb Allan McRae:
> The checking of the package for $srcdir references was overly
> sensitive and gave a lot of what appear to be false positives with
> binary files (in particular with debugging symbols kept).
>
> Restrict the search for $srcdir to non-
On 29/09/10 22:06, Marc - A. Dahlhaus wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 29.09.2010, 21:59 +1000 schrieb Allan McRae:
The checking of the package for $srcdir references was overly
sensitive and gave a lot of what appear to be false positives with
binary files (in particular with debugging symbols kept).
R
On 29/09/10 13:35, Allan McRae wrote:
On 29/09/10 22:06, Marc - A. Dahlhaus wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 29.09.2010, 21:59 +1000 schrieb Allan McRae:
The checking of the package for $srcdir references was overly
sensitive and gave a lot of what appear to be false positives with
binary files (in part
On 29/09/10 22:41, Nathan Wayde wrote:
On 29/09/10 13:35, Allan McRae wrote:
On 29/09/10 22:06, Marc - A. Dahlhaus wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 29.09.2010, 21:59 +1000 schrieb Allan McRae:
The checking of the package for $srcdir references was overly
sensitive and gave a lot of what appear to be fa
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 29/09/10 22:41, Nathan Wayde wrote:
>>
>> On 29/09/10 13:35, Allan McRae wrote:
>>>
>>> On 29/09/10 22:06, Marc - A. Dahlhaus wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 29.09.2010, 21:59 +1000 schrieb Allan McRae:
>
> The checking of the pack
On 29/09/10 13:51, Allan McRae wrote:
[...]
just pipe it through xargs, something like `find "${pkgdir}" -type f
-print0 | xargs -0 grep -m 1 -q "${pkgdir}"`
Doesn't that suffer from the same issue with potentially exceeding the
maximum number of parameters?
no, the list is passed in via t
On 30/09/10 01:35, Allan McRae wrote:
On 29/09/10 22:06, Marc - A. Dahlhaus wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 29.09.2010, 21:59 +1000 schrieb Allan McRae:
The checking of the package for $srcdir references was overly
sensitive and gave a lot of what appear to be false positives with
binary files (in par
On 29/09/10 23:31, Jonathan Conder wrote:
On 30/09/10 01:35, Allan McRae wrote:
On 29/09/10 22:06, Marc - A. Dahlhaus wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 29.09.2010, 21:59 +1000 schrieb Allan McRae:
The checking of the package for $srcdir references was overly
sensitive and gave a lot of what appear to be
On Wed 29 Sep 2010 21:59 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> The checking of the package for $srcdir references was overly
> sensitive and gave a lot of what appear to be false positives with
> binary files (in particular with debugging symbols kept).
>
> Restrict the search for $srcdir to non-binary file
On 30/09/10 11:56, Loui Chang wrote:
On Wed 29 Sep 2010 21:59 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
The checking of the package for $srcdir references was overly
sensitive and gave a lot of what appear to be false positives with
binary files (in particular with debugging symbols kept).
Restrict the search
On Thu 30 Sep 2010 12:10 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 30/09/10 11:56, Loui Chang wrote:
> >On Wed 29 Sep 2010 21:59 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> >>The checking of the package for $srcdir references was overly
> >>sensitive and gave a lot of what appear to be false positives with
> >>binary files (
On 30/09/10 12:26, Loui Chang wrote:
On Thu 30 Sep 2010 12:10 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
On 30/09/10 11:56, Loui Chang wrote:
On Wed 29 Sep 2010 21:59 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
The checking of the package for $srcdir references was overly
sensitive and gave a lot of what appear to be false posi
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Loui Chang wrote:
> On Thu 30 Sep 2010 12:10 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
>> On 30/09/10 11:56, Loui Chang wrote:
>> >On Wed 29 Sep 2010 21:59 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
>> >>The checking of the package for $srcdir references was overly
>> >>sensitive and gave a lot of
On Thu 30 Sep 2010 12:38 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 30/09/10 12:26, Loui Chang wrote:
> >On Thu 30 Sep 2010 12:10 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> >>On 30/09/10 11:56, Loui Chang wrote:
> >>>On Wed 29 Sep 2010 21:59 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> The checking of the package for $srcdir references w
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Loui Chang wrote:
> On Thu 30 Sep 2010 12:38 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
>> On 30/09/10 12:26, Loui Chang wrote:
>> >On Thu 30 Sep 2010 12:10 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
>> >>On 30/09/10 11:56, Loui Chang wrote:
>> >>>On Wed 29 Sep 2010 21:59 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
>
On 02/10/10 02:08, Dan McGee wrote:
[...]
One thought I did have, and this is just a thought, is to store
$pkgdir and $srcdir in the built package in PKGINFO as a way to use
these values later.
-Dan
I would advise against storing it in the PKGINFO if it means that it
ends up in the final bu
17 matches
Mail list logo
