Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH] makepkg: libprovides: don't provide both versioned and unversioned sonames

2020-09-22 Thread Eli Schwartz
On 6/26/20 2:09 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > This patch is fine, but I don't like "newp" as a variable name. It will > not help me understand this in a years time. > > How about versioned_provides=() instead? Yes, that sounds fine to me. Do you want to do a simple replacement while pulling the

Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH] makepkg: libprovides: don't provide both versioned and unversioned sonames

2020-06-26 Thread Allan McRae
On 15/5/20 3:05 am, Eli Schwartz wrote: > If multiple files match the pattern libfoo.so*, we want to check each of > them and see if they are shared libraries, and if so, if they have > versions attached. > > But some packages can have both shared libraries and random files which > match the

[pacman-dev] [PATCH] makepkg: libprovides: don't provide both versioned and unversioned sonames

2020-05-14 Thread Eli Schwartz
If multiple files match the pattern libfoo.so*, we want to check each of them and see if they are shared libraries, and if so, if they have versions attached. But some packages can have both shared libraries and random files which match the filename pattern. This is true at least for files in