This is a bitch of a diffstat, unfortunately, and the patches aren't all that
fun to look through. I have it pushed to my repo as alpm-cleanups if you'd
rather grab it there. The bright side is it should successfully build and test
after each patch as long as they are applied in the order sent here
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
> This is a bitch of a diffstat, unfortunately, and the patches aren't all that
> fun to look through. I have it pushed to my repo as alpm-cleanups if you'd
> rather grab it there. The bright side is it should successfully build and test
> after eac
On Tue 07 June 2011 at 16:36 -0500, Dan McGee wrote:
> This is a bitch of a diffstat, unfortunately, and the patches aren't all that
> fun to look through. I have it pushed to my repo as alpm-cleanups if you'd
> rather grab it there. The bright side is it should successfully build and test
> after
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Rémy Oudompheng
wrote:
> On Tue 07 June 2011 at 16:36 -0500, Dan McGee wrote:
>> This is a bitch of a diffstat, unfortunately, and the patches aren't all that
>> fun to look through. I have it pushed to my repo as alpm-cleanups if you'd
>> rather grab it there. The
On 2011/6/14 Dan McGee wrote:
> Rémy,
>
> Just wanted to ping you as I hadn't heard back from you on this- let
> me know your take on what I said. Looking to clear up my pending
> patches a bit if I can.
Seems OK to me: it's clear enough that I won't be ever satisfied with
either solution, and th
