[pacman-dev] [PATCH 1/5] Tests: Adjust sync023 to correctly test FS#20221

2010-09-25 Thread Jakob Gruber
FS#20221 Issue: calling pacman with '-S --needed ', has in more than one repo. is version 1.1 locally, version 1.1 in an earlier repo (for example testing), and 1.0 in a later repo (for example core). Example: is base-devel make in testing is 1.1 make in core is 1.0 make installed locally is

Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH 1/5] Tests: Adjust sync023 to correctly test FS#20221

2010-09-27 Thread Dan McGee
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 4:40 AM, Jakob Gruber wrote: > FS#20221 ^^ unnecessary text here. :) > > Issue: calling pacman with '-S --needed ', has > in more than one repo. is version 1.1 locally, version 1.1 > in an earlier repo (for example testing), and 1.0 in a later repo (for > example core).

Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH 1/5] Tests: Adjust sync023 to correctly test FS#20221

2010-09-27 Thread Jakob Gruber
On 09/27/2010 05:29 PM, Dan McGee wrote: On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 4:40 AM, Jakob Gruber wrote: FS#20221 ^^ unnecessary text here. :) This is the related bug report. It does look kinda odd in the all by itself in the first line though :) Issue: calling pacman with '-S --needed', has in mo

Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH 1/5] Tests: Adjust sync023 to correctly test FS#20221

2010-09-27 Thread Xavier Chantry
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Jakob Gruber wrote: > > I couldn't see how the original test made any sense, so I adjusted it to > test FS#20221 (as specified in commit > e702f56ea671c6cd1154a0ddb41fa63e97587c85). > > The old PKG_EXIST rules do nothing because pkg{1,2,3} are created in both > the

Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH 1/5] Tests: Adjust sync023 to correctly test FS#20221

2010-09-27 Thread Jakob Gruber
On 09/27/2010 09:54 PM, Xavier Chantry wrote: On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Jakob Gruber wrote: I couldn't see how the original test made any sense, so I adjusted it to test FS#20221 (as specified in commit e702f56ea671c6cd1154a0ddb41fa63e97587c85). The old PKG_EXIST rules do nothing becau