Signed-off-by: Allan McRae
---
README | 36
1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/README b/README
index 1276eaa..5da572f 100644
--- a/README
+++ b/README
@@ -328,3 +328,39 @@ API CHANGES BETWEEN 3.3 AND 3.4
- alpm_pkg_unused_deltas
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Allan McRae
> ---
> README | 36
> 1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/README b/README
> index 1276eaa..5da572f 100644
> --- a/README
> +++ b/README
> @@ -32
Would you approve documenting in alpm.h the type of elements in lists
returned by libalpm functions ? They do not look obvious at all for
someone that is not familiar with the internals of libalpm.
--
Rémy.
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Rémy Oudompheng
wrote:
> Would you approve documenting in alpm.h the type of elements in lists
> returned by libalpm functions ? They do not look obvious at all for
> someone that is not familiar with the internals of libalpm.
Definitely. If you can do it in Doxyg
On 28/02/11 05:29, Dan McGee wrote:
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae
---
README | 36
1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/README b/README
index 1276eaa..5da572f 100644
--- a/READM
On 2011/2/28 Dan McGee wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Rémy Oudompheng
> wrote:
>> Would you approve documenting in alpm.h the type of elements in lists
>> returned by libalpm functions ? They do not look obvious at all for
>> someone that is not familiar with the internals of libalpm.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Rémy Oudompheng
wrote:
> On 2011/2/28 Dan McGee wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Rémy Oudompheng
>> wrote:
>>> Would you approve documenting in alpm.h the type of elements in lists
>>> returned by libalpm functions ? They do not look obvious at all for
>
