On 12/5/20 12:27 am, guilla...@manjaro.org wrote:
> Hi Allan, Hi Anatol,
>
> I was looking to this new multiplexed implementation and I found some
> problems:
> 1) This implementation can lead to download databases from different
> servers, I think it can't be a problem if they are not synced
As
On 12/5/20 3:14 am, guilla...@manjaro.org wrote:
> Le 2020-05-11 17:10, Eli Schwartz a écrit :
>> On 5/11/20 10:27 AM, guilla...@manjaro.org wrote:
>>> Hi Allan, Hi Anatol,
>>>
>>> I was looking to this new multiplexed implementation and I found some
>>> problems:
>>> 1) This implementation can
Hello Guillaume
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 7:51 AM wrote:
>
> Hi Allan, Hi Anatol,
>
> I was looking to this new multiplexed implementation and I found some
> problems:
> 1) This implementation can lead to download databases from different
> servers, I think it can't be a problem if they are not
On 5/11/20 10:27 AM, guilla...@manjaro.org wrote:
> Hi Allan, Hi Anatol,
>
> I was looking to this new multiplexed implementation and I found some
> problems:
> 1) This implementation can lead to download databases from different
> servers, I think it can't be a problem if they are not synced
Hi Allan, Hi Anatol,
I was looking to this new multiplexed implementation and I found some
problems:
1) This implementation can lead to download databases from different
servers, I think it can't be a problem if they are not synced
2) Differents download payloads are created for databases and
On 7/5/20 6:01 pm, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 7/5/20 11:49 am, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
>> Now when all callers of the old alpm_db_update() function are gone we can
>> remove this implementation. And then rename alpm_dbs_update() function to
>> alpm_db_update().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anatol Pomozov
>>
On 7/5/20 11:49 am, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
> Now when all callers of the old alpm_db_update() function are gone we can
> remove this implementation. And then rename alpm_dbs_update() function to
> alpm_db_update().
>
> Signed-off-by: Anatol Pomozov
> ---
../src/pacman/util.c: In function
On 7/5/20 11:49 am, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
> Now when all callers of the old alpm_db_update() function are gone we can
> remove this implementation. And then rename alpm_dbs_update() function to
> alpm_db_update().
>
> Signed-off-by: Anatol Pomozov
> ---
Thanks.
Also good to have the README
Now when all callers of the old alpm_db_update() function are gone we can
remove this implementation. And then rename alpm_dbs_update() function to
alpm_db_update().
Signed-off-by: Anatol Pomozov
---
README| 3 +
lib/libalpm/alpm.h| 40 +-
lib/libalpm/be_sync.c |
