On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Xavier wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>> Xavier schrieb:
>>>
>>> Before, repo-rm on the last package would leave the last package in
>>> the database, which was quite odd.
>>> Having an empty file would be odd too, because tar/bs
Am Donnerstag 24 September 2009 08:58:50 schrieb Xavier:
> Would a server/mirror error still produce a valid tar.gz file ?
Very unlikely.
PS: Nice; now we need someone to deploy this on gerolde/sigurd. :-)
--
Pierre Schmitz, http://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 23 September 2009 11:45:53 schrieb Xavier:
>> Anyway this seems to work for all combination (4) of gnutar/bsdtar, so
>> it is still my preferred solution :
>> tar cvzf test.tar.gz -T /dev/null
>> tar xf test.tar.gz
>
> Looks fine
Am Mittwoch 23 September 2009 11:45:53 schrieb Xavier:
> Anyway this seems to work for all combination (4) of gnutar/bsdtar, so
> it is still my preferred solution :
> tar cvzf test.tar.gz -T /dev/null
> tar xf test.tar.gz
Looks fine to me; and I think we should implement this. The point is that i
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Xavier schrieb:
>>
>> Before, repo-rm on the last package would leave the last package in
>> the database, which was quite odd.
>> Having an empty file would be odd too, because tar/bsdtar would fail on
>> it.
>
> $ touch foo.db.tar.gz
> $
Xavier schrieb:
Before, repo-rm on the last package would leave the last package in
the database, which was quite odd.
Having an empty file would be odd too, because tar/bsdtar would fail on it.
$ touch foo.db.tar.gz
$ bsdtar -xf foo.db.tar.gz
$ echo $?
0
$
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 2:09 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> With the community-testing repo now being empty, I get the following:
>>
>>> pacman -Syu
>> :: Synchronizing package databases...
>> kernel64 is up to date
>> testing
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With the community-testing repo now being empty, I get the following:
>
>> pacman -Syu
> :: Synchronizing package databases...
> kernel64 is up to date
> testing 10.3K 21.2K/s 00:00:00 [#]
> 100%
Hi,
With the community-testing repo now being empty, I get the following:
> pacman -Syu
:: Synchronizing package databases...
kernel64 is up to date
testing 10.3K 21.2K/s 00:00:00
[#] 100%
core 33.8K 34.8K/s 00:00:01
[#
