On 28/02/11 17:52, edmeiste...@hushmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 13:55:27 -0400 Xavier Chantry
chantry.xav...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 6:42 PM,edmeiste...@hushmail.com
wrote:
Hello pacman team!
I've been following development for quite some time, and would
like
to
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 28/02/11 17:52, edmeiste...@hushmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 13:55:27 -0400 Xavier Chantry
chantry.xav...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 6:42 PM,edmeiste...@hushmail.com
wrote:
Hello pacman team!
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 13:55:27 -0400 Xavier Chantry
chantry.xav...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 6:42 PM, edmeiste...@hushmail.com
wrote:
Hello pacman team!
I've been following development for quite some time, and would
like
to submit my package signing patches for review.
Out
Hello pacman team!
I've been following development for quite some time, and would like
to submit my package signing patches for review.
However, since some of the files are entirely new, they would have
a license header. I would like to know under what license should I
release my work.
I
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 6:42 PM, edmeiste...@hushmail.com wrote:
Hello pacman team!
I've been following development for quite some time, and would like
to submit my package signing patches for review.
Out of curiosity, what do these patches accomplish exactly ?
However, since some of the
