On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Nagy Gabor ng...@bibl.u-szeged.hu wrote:
In fact I don't like neither force nor epoch. Epoch is just a version
prefix, why don't we let the packager to workaround this (KISS)? We can
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Nagy Gabor ng...@bibl.u-szeged.hu wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Nagy Gabor ng...@bibl.u-szeged.hu wrote:
In fact I don't like neither force nor epoch. Epoch is just a version
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 21:23:22 +0100, Xavier Chantry
chantry.xav...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Nagy Gabor ng...@bibl.u-szeged.hu wrote:
Well, of course a new separator is not necessary, packager can do
On 08.12.2010 00:40, Dan McGee wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 08/12/10 08:45, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
On 07.12.2010 23:51, Nagy Gabor wrote:
$ sudo pacman -Su
warning: supertuxkart: local (0.6.2a-2) is newer than community
(0.7rc1-1)
On 08/12/10 22:31, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
On 08.12.2010 00:40, Dan McGee wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Allan McRaeal...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 08/12/10 08:45, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
On 07.12.2010 23:51, Nagy Gabor wrote:
$ sudo pacman -Su
warning: supertuxkart: local
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Nagy Gabor ng...@bibl.u-szeged.hu wrote:
In fact I don't like neither force nor epoch. Epoch is just a version
prefix, why don't we let the packager to workaround this (KISS)? We can
introduce a
$ sudo pacman -Su
warning: supertuxkart: local (0.6.2a-2) is newer than community (0.7rc1-1)
What? First I thought that our vercmp code is buggy, but vercmp
binary worked as expected. Then I figured out that my local package has
epoch=1, but the epoch is unset on the community package (so this
In fact I don't like neither force nor epoch. Epoch is just a version
prefix, why don't we let the packager to workaround this (KISS)? We can
introduce a new separator (now we have one: '.'), for example '#', and
let the packager define his favourite pkgversion (maybe epoch in mind),
like
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Nagy Gabor ng...@bibl.u-szeged.hu wrote:
In fact I don't like neither force nor epoch. Epoch is just a version
prefix, why don't we let the packager to workaround this (KISS)? We can
introduce a new separator (now we have one: '.'), for example '#', and
let the
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Nagy Gabor ng...@bibl.u-szeged.hu wrote:
$ sudo pacman -Su
warning: supertuxkart: local (0.6.2a-2) is newer than community (0.7rc1-1)
What? First I thought that our vercmp code is buggy, but vercmp
binary worked as expected. Then I figured out that my local
On 08/12/10 08:45, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
On 07.12.2010 23:51, Nagy Gabor wrote:
$ sudo pacman -Su
warning: supertuxkart: local (0.6.2a-2) is newer than community (0.7rc1-1)
What? First I thought that our vercmp code is buggy, but vercmp
binary worked as expected. Then I figured out that my
11 matches
Mail list logo
