On 04/24/2010 05:27 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
On 25/04/10 00:13, Nagy Gabor wrote:
Any other points/concerns people want to mention?
Allan
One more thing I want to mention: pacman -S group interactive versus
non-interactive behaviour. Details:
On 09/05/10 22:46, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 04/24/2010 05:27 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
On 25/04/10 00:13, Nagy Gabor wrote:
Any other points/concerns people want to mention?
Allan
One more thing I want to mention: pacman -S group interactive versus
non-interactive behaviour. Details:
Any other points/concerns people want to mention?
Allan
One more thing I want to mention: pacman -S group interactive versus
non-interactive behaviour. Details:
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2010-March/010516.html
Bye
On 25/04/10 00:13, Nagy Gabor wrote:
Any other points/concerns people want to mention?
Allan
One more thing I want to mention: pacman -S group interactive versus
non-interactive behaviour. Details:
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2010-March/010516.html
This is probably a