Re: [pacman-dev] Release plans [-S group]

2010-05-09 Thread Ionut Biru
On 04/24/2010 05:27 PM, Allan McRae wrote: On 25/04/10 00:13, Nagy Gabor wrote: Any other points/concerns people want to mention? Allan One more thing I want to mention: pacman -S group interactive versus non-interactive behaviour. Details:

Re: [pacman-dev] Release plans [-S group]

2010-05-09 Thread Allan McRae
On 09/05/10 22:46, Ionut Biru wrote: On 04/24/2010 05:27 PM, Allan McRae wrote: On 25/04/10 00:13, Nagy Gabor wrote: Any other points/concerns people want to mention? Allan One more thing I want to mention: pacman -S group interactive versus non-interactive behaviour. Details:

Re: [pacman-dev] Release plans [-S group]

2010-04-24 Thread Nagy Gabor
Any other points/concerns people want to mention? Allan One more thing I want to mention: pacman -S group interactive versus non-interactive behaviour. Details: http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2010-March/010516.html Bye

Re: [pacman-dev] Release plans [-S group]

2010-04-24 Thread Allan McRae
On 25/04/10 00:13, Nagy Gabor wrote: Any other points/concerns people want to mention? Allan One more thing I want to mention: pacman -S group interactive versus non-interactive behaviour. Details: http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2010-March/010516.html This is probably a