[pacman-dev] should we show maintainer info in pacman -Qi / -Si ?

2011-02-13 Thread Dieter Plaetinck
with pacman -Qi or pacman -Si we show the person who packaged it, but not the maintainer. This makes it harder to get in touch with the right person then it should be. Often I will start talking to the packager (or assign a ticket to him), only to have that person to tell me "hey, i'm just the gu

Re: [pacman-dev] should we show maintainer info in pacman -Qi / -Si ?

2011-02-13 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 11:22:54 +0100, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > with pacman -Qi or pacman -Si we show the person who packaged it, but > not the maintainer. > This makes it harder to get in touch with the right person then it should be. > Often I will start talking to the packager (or assign a ticket

Re: [pacman-dev] should we show maintainer info in pacman -Qi / -Si ?

2011-02-13 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:42:38AM +0100, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 11:22:54 +0100, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > > with pacman -Qi or pacman -Si we show the person who packaged it, but > > not the maintainer. > > This makes it harder to get in touch with the right person then it shou

Re: [pacman-dev] should we show maintainer info in pacman -Qi / -Si ?

2011-02-13 Thread Loui Chang
On Sun 13 Feb 2011 17:05 +0100, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:42:38AM +0100, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > > On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 11:22:54 +0100, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > > > with pacman -Qi or pacman -Si we show the person who packaged it, but > > > not the maintainer. > > > This m

Re: [pacman-dev] should we show maintainer info in pacman -Qi / -Si ?

2011-02-13 Thread Allan McRae
On 14/02/11 02:56, Loui Chang wrote: On Sun 13 Feb 2011 17:05 +0100, Lukas Fleischer wrote: On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:42:38AM +0100, Pierre Schmitz wrote: On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 11:22:54 +0100, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: with pacman -Qi or pacman -Si we show the person who packaged it, but not the